Teams

WI/Amos/18&over5.0W

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-11vs WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT SaetangWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lesniewski / Samantha Kohn vs Margaret Bugnacki / Shannon Dudy6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLouella Amos vs Melissa Gebhardt6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSydney Verbauwhede / Allyson Verbauwhede vs Samantha Saetang / Elizabeth Reuter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-27vs WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT SaetangWon 30
W#1 DoublesLouella Amos / Samantha Kohn vs Michelle Tallentyre / Samantha Saetang7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSydney Verbauwhede vs Margaret Bugnacki6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllyson Verbauwhede / Jennifer Lesniewski vs Elizabeth Reuter / Kathleen Kappel6-2, 6-4
2026-06-14vs WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lesniewski / Megan Schneider vs Ricki Budewitz / Larissa O'Rourke6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKalla Schaefer vs Katherine Cunningham6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllyson Verbauwhede / Sydney Verbauwhede vs Morgan Lee / Rya Arreazola6-3, 6-2
2026-06-14vs WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT LeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKalla Schaefer / Megan Schneider vs Rya Arreazola / Morgan Wilson6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLouella Amos vs Ricki Budewitz2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllyson Verbauwhede / Jennifer Lesniewski vs Larissa O'Rourke / Amberlee Baugus6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI/Amos/18&over5.0W40111378
2WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT Lee225716112
3WI Adult 18&O 5.0W MALT Saetang0421021135

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Sydney Verbauwhede
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.50
Jennifer Lesniewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.50
Megan Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.47
Louella Amos
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Kalla Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.45
Samantha Kohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Allyson Verbauwhede
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Verbauwhede + Sydney Verbauwhede7257% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Verbauwhede
144W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.51
Jennifer Lesniewski
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
4.50
Megan Schneider
121W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.50
5
Louella Amos
110W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
4.47
Kalla Schaefer
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
4.46
Samantha Kohn
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Allyson Verbauwhede
62W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.