Teams

KY/LOU/FOUNTAIN

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-12-06vs KY/LOU/SCHMIDT/BERRY/WALLITSCHWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Kate Shain / Lily McDonogh vs Julia Mackenzie-Rollinson / Jenny O'Donnell4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Penn vs Kelsie Williams6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStaci Fountain / GENELLE COCHRAN vs Shaheen Khan / Mary Wallitsch6-7, 2-6
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/COOMES/RILEYWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Fox / Lily McDonogh vs Elizabeth Austin / Meredith Erickson6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Dehner vs Brittany Brice6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKasey Stiefvater / Lindsay Brown vs Kim Riley / Penny DeVenuto6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lily McDonogh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kasey Stiefvater
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Amanda Penn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ashley Dehner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Staci Fountain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Cheryl Fox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Mary Kate Shain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.28
Kate Huff
published
3.21
GENELLE COCHRAN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Laura Parkman
published
3.14
Maggie Harlow
published
3.09
Danielle Hallion
published 3.5
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Janet Parrish
published
3.01
Laura Mahoney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Amanda Helfrich
published 3
2.90
Laura Spillman
published
2.88
Hayley Phillips
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Carolyn Holland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marie McCauley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily McDonogh + Mary Kate Shain303 matchesnot enough data
Lily McDonogh + Laura Mahoney303 matchesnot enough data
Janet Parrish + Maggie Harlow303 matchesnot enough data
Staci Fountain + GENELLE COCHRAN213 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Fox + Amanda Penn303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Penn + Mary Kate Shain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lily McDonogh
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Kasey Stiefvater
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Amanda Penn
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Ashley Dehner
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Staci Fountain
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Cheryl Fox
29W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Mary Kate Shain
23W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Kate Huff
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
GENELLE COCHRAN
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Laura Parkman
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Maggie Harlow
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Danielle Hallion
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Janet Parrish
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Laura Mahoney
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Amanda Helfrich
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Laura Spillman
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Hayley Phillips
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Carolyn Holland
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Marie McCauley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.