Teams

High Voltage

2022 NOVA Singles Men · NOVA Singles 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRajakumar Chithambaram vs Justin Lee0-6, 2-6
2022-11-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesRajakumar Chithambaram vs Rahul Sharma7-5, 5-0
2022-11-04Won 10
W#3 SinglesRajakumar Chithambaram vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-26vs Team KlempererWon 10
W#2 SinglesRajakumar Chithambaram vs Lutz Braum6-4, 6-2
2022-10-14vs Team GlashowWon 10
W#3 SinglesRajakumar Chithambaram vs Jordan Glashow3-6, 5-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Babak Rassuli
published 4.5
4.17
Bob White
published 4.5
3.96
Rajakumar Chithambaram
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4
3.96
Manish Desai
published
3.87
Thuan Lai
published
3.81
Eric Ottenheimer
published 4
3.75
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rajakumar Chithambaram + Senthil Kumar Seetharaman101153% games+10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Babak Rassuli
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Bob White
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Rajakumar Chithambaram
129W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Manish Desai
28W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Thuan Lai
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Senthil Kumar Seetharaman
171W–118L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Eric Ottenheimer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Sriram Gopalakrishnan
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.