Teams

Golfcrest - Racket Raisers

2023 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Yolanda Escobedo
published
3.27
Jennifer L Flud
published
Chelsea Cragin
published 3.5
3.22
Kimberly Floyd
published
3.17
Amy Judd
published 3.5
3.16
Marie Purdom
published
3.12
Sharon Maetzold
published
3.11
Linda Ratcliff
published
2.92
Holly Herncall
published 3
2.85
Candi Stanley
published 3
2.84
Kelly Idoux
published
Dorinda Corbett
published 3
Lindsey Boone
published
Meg Crowley
published
Olivia Perez
published
Talbott Shaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Judd + Yolanda Escobedo4447% games−2.5% vs expected
Amy Judd + Kelly Idoux033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yolanda Escobedo
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer L Flud
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chelsea Cragin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Floyd
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Judd
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Marie Purdom
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Sharon Maetzold
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
Linda Ratcliff
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Holly Herncall
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Candi Stanley
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Kelly Idoux
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.84
3
Dorinda Corbett
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Boone
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg Crowley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Olivia Perez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Talbott Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.