Teams

DThayaprasat (Park Road)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-10vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAbbey Neff / Cassandra Wincek vs Samantha Danesis / Meghan Bartholomew2-6, 3-6
2024-10-10vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Becky Tennyson vs Jordan Bowers / Alison Lacy Sherrill6-2, 6-3
2024-09-19vs DWest (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAbbey Neff / Cassandra Wincek vs Natalie Ivanov / Diana West6-2, 6-4
2024-09-06vs JVarn (Palisades)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Becky Tennyson vs Jordan Bowers / Tanya Hecht3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAbbey Neff / Cassandra Wincek vs Jessica Varn / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs DWest (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCarson Rose Tennyson / Becky Tennyson vs Natalie Osman / Kindell Schmitt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary McGehee / Cassandra Wincek vs Samantha Danesis / Toni Laney6-3, 7-5
2024-08-15vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSanjana Sudhir / Becky Tennyson vs Jordan Bowers / Tanya Hecht6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Anderson / Cassandra Wincek vs Callie Schmit / Karen Schmit6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Sarah Cimmino
published
4.67
Brittney Desmond
published 5
4.60
4.56
Abbey Neff
published 5
4.56
Cassandra Wincek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.30
Christine Kahm
published 4.5
4.26
Brittany Simpson
published 4.5
4.03
Becky Tennyson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Mary McGehee
published
Sanjana Sudhir
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Cimmino
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.84
5
Brittney Desmond
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Carson Rose Tennyson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
5
Abbey Neff
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.56
5
Cassandra Wincek
101W–29L career · 10 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.56
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Christine Kahm
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Brittany Simpson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Becky Tennyson
120W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Mary McGehee
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sanjana Sudhir
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.