Teams

LLW - Team Weber - Bako

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.0 - Bake

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-07vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Minda Owens vs Erin Black / Lauren Huynh6-4, 7-6
2023-04-30vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarri Tillema / Misty Haverstock vs Brooke Fernandez / Laurie Haagsma3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-26vs Volley GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarri Tillema / Minda Owens vs Brooke Fernandez / Cheryl Garone6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Linh Bui
published
3.59
Marites Idica
published
3.48
Brooke Drake
published 4
Ashley Periera
published 3.5
3.18
Meghan Carnegie
published
2.92
SUZANNE TEVELDE
published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
2.78
Minda Owens
published 3
2.74
Rachel Friesen
published
2.62
Amanda Buoni
published 3
2.48
Nancy Lerma
published
2.28
Trellis Green
published
Misty Haverstock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linh Bui
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Marites Idica
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Ashley Periera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meghan Carnegie
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
SUZANNE TEVELDE
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Grace Lyn Pangaldan
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
Rachel Friesen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Amanda Buoni
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
Nancy Lerma
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
Trellis Green
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.28
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.