Teams

BGibson (WSRC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-17vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Klug / Eric Ovendorf vs Jeff Morse / William Roork6-3, 6-4
2025-04-16vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Ovendorf / Ken Klug vs Jeff Weiss / Kevin Woods6-3, 6-4
2025-04-03vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesEric Ovendorf / George Koskinas vs Richard Williamson / Kevin Woods4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKen Klug / Brad Lucas vs Jeff Morse / Anthony Hyde7-5, 6-4
2025-03-27vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Klug / Eric Ovendorf vs Jeff Morse / Anthony Hyde3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-20vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Klug / George Koskinas vs Jeff Morse / Anthony Hyde6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-13vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Koskinas / Ken Klug vs Jeff Morse / Jeff Weiss6-4, 6-3
2025-03-06vs JMorse/RWilliamson (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Ovendorf / George VanDyne vs Richard Williamson / William Roork6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Eric Ovendorf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Graham Phillips
published
2.99
Ken Klug
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Bruce Gibson
published 3
2.87
George Koskinas
published
2.84
Marc Setzer
published
Brad Lucas
published 3
2.71
Eloy ROY
published
2.60
Walter Harfmann
published
George VanDyne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Klug + Eric Ovendorf12559% games+4.5% vs expected
Marc Setzer + Eloy ROY044 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Gibson + George Koskinas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eric Ovendorf
123W–90L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Graham Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Ken Klug
101W–84L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Bruce Gibson
29W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
George Koskinas
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Marc Setzer
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Brad Lucas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eloy ROY
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Walter Harfmann
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
George VanDyne
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.