Teams

BBTL75/Fillion/SunCity

75 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-12vs HHTL75/Ball/CCHHWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanne Patterson / Gail Richards vs Pauline Delaughter / Linda Ginsburg6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJune Burns / Ruth Brown vs Rosanne Ball / Laureen Yingling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDianne Grazier / Ellen Hart vs Bobby Earnhardt / Marjorie Gaynor4-6, 6-7
2024-10-12vs LCTA75/SawyerLost 12
L#1 DoublesAda Blount / Joanne Patterson vs Maxine Cooke / Carol Poole4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGail Richards / Lorraine Sharpe vs Susie Fancher / Susan Mock6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBette Lynch / Ellen Hart vs Sharon Skowronek / Charlene Willis2-6, 1-6
2024-10-11vs HHTL75/Ball/CCHHWon 21
L#1 DoublesJune Burns / Joanne Patterson vs Catherine Forlenza / Patricia Haddad3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAda Blount / Gail Richards vs Dorothy Fein / Betty Jankoski4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBette Lynch / Lorraine Sharpe vs Bobby Earnhardt / MaryAnn Bromley6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2024-10-11vs LCTA75/SawyerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAda Blount / Joanne Patterson vs Maxine Cooke / Carol Poole3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Brown / Gail Richards vs Charlene Willis / Andrea Weinstein7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBette Lynch / Dianne Grazier vs Susan Mock / Susie Fancher6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Joanne Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Gail Richards
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Ada Blount
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bette Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ellen Hart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
June Burns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Lorraine Sharpe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Carol Fillion
published
Dianne Grazier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Sharpe + Gail Richards3252% gamesnot enough data
June Burns + Ellen Hart134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanne Patterson
61W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Gail Richards
56W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ada Blount
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Bette Lynch
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ellen Hart
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
June Burns
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Lorraine Sharpe
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Carol Fillion
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Dianne Grazier
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.