Teams

ACharleston-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-01vs EMillard-DURSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMarta Robertson vs Emma Gould7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJui-Hua Hsieh vs Elyssa Millard6-7, 2-4
2026-06-24vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMarta Robertson vs Ana Goodwin0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWilton Burns vs Kim McWhorter4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Nagy vs Lora Alkhawam1-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs MLong-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMarta Robertson vs Cori Taylor6-0, 7-5
L#3 SinglesWilton Burns vs Tracy Rose3-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs KCaravella-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesAdrianne Charleston vs Madison Collier2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAddie Eckles vs Anna Brown0-6, 0-6
2026-06-03vs LHeymann-UNCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdrianne Charleston vs Julia Haslett6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesWilton Burns vs Barbara Correal6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-20vs LKulp-SVCLost 12
L#1 SinglesAddie Eckles vs Eve Hammett0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAdrianne Charleston vs Christine Sudzina Schut6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJessica Nagy vs Ashlyn Zebrowski1-6, 3-6
2026-05-13vs LBible-DURLost 02
L#2 SinglesMarta Robertson vs Courtney Mills7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesWilton Burns vs Nsimba Mahungu4-6, 2-6
2026-05-11vs SLawrence-TOCHWon 10
W#1 SinglesAdrianne Charleston vs Aine Lynch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EMillard-DUR44121226220
2ACharleston-DUR2691532239
3LHeymann-UNC1742040250
4SLawrence-TOCH0861838236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jui-Hua Hsieh
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.07
Adrianne Charleston
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Addie Eckles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Wilton Burns
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 43% · published
3.00
Marta Robertson
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.86
Jessica Nagy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jui-Hua Hsieh
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Adrianne Charleston
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Addie Eckles
4W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Wilton Burns
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Marta Robertson
12W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Jessica Nagy
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.