Teams

Brookwood Manor (Kallie Clack)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Fong Huang)

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-28vs Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle McIntosh / Alicia Doyle vs Susan Bracken / Allison Ellison6-2, 3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGretchen Hughes / Mary Saye vs Lauralee Burke / Lisa Tivy2-6, 7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLacy Wade / Zane Maraschiello vs Melanie Freeman / Gail Larkin5-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesDeborah Citron / Sophe Goodwin vs Bonnie Ferguson / Marie Hartley3-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesKallie Clack / Alycia Parker vs Lauralee Burke / Susan Bracken6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlicia Doyle / Kate Thompkins vs Tomeka Blackmon / Jeanne VanEmburgh6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Saye / Karen Wood vs Bonnie Ferguson / Faye McCorkle6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Fong Huang) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Heather Paden
published
3.72
Joanna Shackelford
published
3.61
Michelle McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Katherine Greene
published
3.60
Lacy Wade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Mary Saye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Marge Hossom
published
3.56
Kallie Clack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Alicia Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Zane Maraschiello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Barbara Powe
published 3.5
3.19
Deborah Citron
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Sophe Goodwin
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Zaboth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kallie Clack + Joanna Shackelford5159% games+2.5% vs expected
Marge Hossom + Alicia Doyle5164% gamesnot enough data
Mary Saye + Joanna Shackelford4257% gamesnot enough data
Michelle McIntosh + Joanna Shackelford044 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Doyle + Katherine Greene224 matchesnot enough data
Sophe Goodwin + Zane Maraschiello404 matchesnot enough data
Kallie Clack + Alicia Doyle123 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Doyle + Sophe Goodwin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Paden
38W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Joanna Shackelford
19W–16L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Michelle McIntosh
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Katherine Greene
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Lacy Wade
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mary Saye
57W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Marge Hossom
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Kallie Clack
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alicia Doyle
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Zane Maraschiello
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Powe
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Citron
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Sophe Goodwin
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Melanie Zaboth
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.