Teams

Drake, Ruth

2025 Adult 40 & Over-JXN · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-15vs McKenzie, ToniaLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Jill Strickland vs Tamara Jackson / Iona Remulta1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRuth Drake vs Lanessa Jenkins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Missy Donaldson vs Esther Young / Temekia Jackson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSherry Bouldin / Kim Price vs Rose Edmonston / Debra Black7-5, 6-0
2025-04-08vs Prince, TerriWon 21
L#1 DoublesRuth Drake / Amy Kirby vs Cheryl Sykes / Rena Shepherd3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Jill Strickland vs Michelle Loftin / Nancy Miller6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMissy Donaldson / Kim Price vs Gwynn Cunningham / Ivey Welch7-5, 6-3
2025-04-01vs Coins, JimmieLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Amy Kirby vs Kay Beasley / Erica Craft3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Price / Sherry Bouldin vs Erika Andrews / Natalie Holmes4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Drake / Tammie Stringer vs Jeana Swan / Tina Smith3-6, 1-6
2025-03-25vs Leo, PamLost 03
L#1 DoublesMissy Donaldson / Amy Kirby vs Barbie Heckenberger / Jill Webb1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Drake / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Pam Leo / Chase King4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSherry Bouldin / Barnessa Cook vs Summer Hood / Laura Collins4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Sims, GinnyLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Jill Strickland vs Ginny Sims / Sharon Ryan1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKim Price vs Amanda Barry4-6, 5-4
L#2 DoublesMissy Donaldson / Diane Hartman vs Kelli Nicholson / Debbie Bryant5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Drake / Sherry Bouldin vs Joy Cloud / Lisa Wheat3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-25vs Watson, Lee AnneLost 04
L#1 DoublesDiane Hartman / Jill Strickland vs Shelley White / Carrie Rayborn1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKim Price vs Kate Feldman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Bouldin / Jeanie Malouf vs Jennifer Tripoli / Jennifer Bradshaw1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Drake / Tammie Stringer vs Sonya Covey / Megan Leake6-7, 0-6
2025-02-19vs Welch, JanaLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Amy Kirby vs Lindsey Fonville / Lynn Davis5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKim Price vs Robin Ball2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeigh Anne Coleman / Diane Hartman vs Kathryn Johnson / Bridget Carmody1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Drake / Barnessa Cook vs Cheri Browning / Stephanie McKnatt4-6, 1-6
2025-02-11vs Crowder, JeannaLost 03
L#1 DoublesRuth Drake / Missy Donaldson vs Jeanna Crowder / Natalie Hutto2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSherry Bouldin vs Catherine Stoltzfus2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Price / Paula Boulanger vs Mary Wilsford Hodges / Meredith Womack3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Powers, CatherineSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPaula Boulanger / Dana King vs Catherine Powers / Elizabeth Bailey5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRuth Drake vs Allison Carroll6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiane Hartman / Leigh Anne Coleman vs Dawn Vance / Robyn Pressley6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTammie Stringer / Kim Price vs Tonya Morgan Barber / Manda James6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Crowder, Jeanna101341026284
2Sims, Ginny92301434320
3Prince, Terri2782856371
4Drake, Ruth1872960389
5Powers, Catherine0943265422

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Diane Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Amy Kirby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Missy Donaldson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.39
Kim Price
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.29
Sherry Bouldin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Barnessa Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanie Malouf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lucy Holmes
published
Paula Boulanger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ruth Drake
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Tammie Stringer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Boulanger + Jill Strickland123 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Bouldin + Kim Price123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Hartman
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amy Kirby
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Missy Donaldson
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Kim Price
14W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Sherry Bouldin
13W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Barnessa Cook
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanie Malouf
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Strickland
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucy Holmes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Boulanger
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Drake
5W–15L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammie Stringer
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.