Teams

Gerilynn Sanders W6.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-24vs Gemela Lewis W6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Bransky / Annette Delbridge vs Annissa Obasi / Joan Thorne6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaria Esteve / Gerilynn Sanders vs Gemela Lewis / Jazmine Urquhart7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnnette Hedblom / Donna Wolf vs Anita Adoba / Jennifer Parr4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-23vs Hazel Robbins W6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLeila Gibson / Amy Kelton vs Sarah Snitker / Ashley Samber3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Hedblom / Sarah Roberts vs Chrissy Stansell / Melissa Fox4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Madden / Gerilynn Sanders vs Hazel Robbins / Tarryn Uran4-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs Diane Thornton W6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Bransky / Annette Delbridge vs Stephanie Shah / Talia Pouratian0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Esteve / Gerilynn Sanders vs Rachel Ladin / Erin Baldwin3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Madden / Donna Wolf vs Jackie Fogle / Lynn Johnson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-22vs Teri Wilson W6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLeila Gibson / Amy Kelton vs Sarah Montgomery / Debra Driscoll7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Bransky / Gerilynn Sanders vs Teri Wilson / Sarah Southcott2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Madden / Sarah Roberts vs MARY DAMKROGER / Jennifer Kinder1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Adrienne Bransky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Annette Hedblom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Leila Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Amy Kelton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Donna Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Annette Delbridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Gerilynn Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Madden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerilynn Sanders + Donna Wolf9257% gamesnot enough data
Annette Delbridge + Adrienne Bransky123 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Bransky + Gerilynn Sanders033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adrienne Bransky
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Annette Hedblom
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Leila Gibson
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Kelton
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Donna Wolf
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Annette Delbridge
9W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Gerilynn Sanders
48W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lauren Madden
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.