Teams

Sesin - Baseline Resistance

2025 Howard Singles · Howard Singles 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesMichael Hansberry vs Victor Sanchez7-5, 6-4
2025-10-07vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMichael Hansberry vs George Sybert6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Lippy - Volley Llama 3.5 SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesMichael Punsalan vs MATTHEW HEINRICHS6-4, 7-6
2025-09-26vs Ghim - Steely Vanguard-SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesMichael Hansberry vs Jarey Wang2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesMichael Punsalan vs Kwangsoo Jeon3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJustin Parsley vs David Djajaputra2-6, 5-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Sesin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-15vs Foehrkolb - Mishit Winners 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJustin Parsley vs George Sybert4-6, 5-5
2025-09-03vs Ghim - Steely Vanguard-SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Punsalan vs Hyunjae Jeon2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMichael Hansberry vs Florin Iancu3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
David Warren
published 3.5
3.39
Henry Jiao
published 3.5
3.38
Erik Avant
published 3.5
3.29
Michael Sesin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Justin Parsley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Michael Hansberry
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Michael Punsalan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
William Ritchey
published
3.02
Richard Brandt
published
2.73
Frank Barnett
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Punsalan + Michael Sesin2644% games+3.7% vs expected
Justin Parsley + Michael Sesin1640% gamesnot enough data
Erik Avant + Michael Sesin4171% gamesnot enough data
Michael Punsalan + Justin Parsley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Warren
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Henry Jiao
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Erik Avant
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Michael Sesin
70W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Justin Parsley
25W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Michael Hansberry
109W–157L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Michael Punsalan
60W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
William Ritchey
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.09
Richard Brandt
20W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Frank Barnett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.