← Teams

MPRC-Atkins

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jeff Anhaltzer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
George Husbands
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kevin Meier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Michael Feely
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Tommy Atkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Gerald Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Robert Wendland
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 0
Results8 ties
2021-11-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Wendland / Gerald Chase vs Rick Raivio / Augustin Belindean6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hertford / Kevin Meier vs Jon Peters / David Smiley7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesD Michael Jones / Jeff Anhaltzer vs Rolf Ellingsen / Kimbal Logan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-31Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesGerald Chase / Robert Wendland vs Robert Truong / Gerry Nuthmann6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Meier / William Hertford vs Dale Christensen / James Lawrence6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesD Michael Jones / Jeff Anhaltzer vs Kevin Semonsen / Norman Langston6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesWilliam Hertford / Dan Wolff vs Brady Berry / Paul Harwood6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTommy Atkins / Brad Phillips vs Shawn Boyce / Jeff Wheeler6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Feely / D Michael Jones vs Craig Frasier / John Bergin6-0, 6-2
2021-10-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Wendland / Dan Wolff vs Gerry Nuthmann / Wes Milligan7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Hertford / Kevin Meier vs Kevin Semonsen / Norman Langston6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesD Michael Jones / Michael Feely vs Dale Christensen / Michael Saling6-4, 6-4
2021-10-03Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesGerald Chase / Robert Wendland vs John Wallin / John Hapke6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTommy Atkins / Brad Phillips vs David Smiley / Wei Pan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Hertford / Michael Feely vs Kimbal Logan / Jon Peters6-2, 6-2
2021-10-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesGeorge Husbands / Dan Wolff vs Steve Harris / Paul Laurent7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Wendland / Michael Feely vs Bruce Robertson / Jonathan Steinhoff6-4, 6-4
2021-09-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTommy Atkins / George Husbands vs Lawrence Reichman / Steven Christenson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeff Anhaltzer / Robert Wendland vs Matthew Casimo / Tom Sloan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Meier / D Michael Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-09-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hertford / George Husbands vs Scott Keeney / Kip Stevenson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDan Wolff / Robert Wendland vs Richard Anderson / Lawrence Reichman7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTommy Atkins / D Michael Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeff Anhaltzer
90W–97L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
George Husbands
29W–26L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kevin Meier
16W–14L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Feely
11W–15L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Dan Wolff
25W–51L career
12%88%1%
3.16
3.5
Tommy Atkins
22W–53L career
14%86%0%
3.10
3.5
Gerald Chase
52W–41L career
28%72%0%
3.06
0
Robert Wendland
15W–19L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.