Teams

KY/LEX/Moreman

2025 USTA SINGLES LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Women 2.5 (Singles)

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-02vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 10
W#2 SinglesMary Mason Boaz vs Jennifer Hoy6-3, 6-2
2025-08-21vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 20
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Nickerson vs Allyson Foster6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Lindsey Burchett6-1, 6-3
2025-08-10vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 21
L#1 SinglesMary Mason Boaz vs Amanda Fredericks3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAnna Marino vs Jennifer Hoy6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesNiki Moss vs Meghan Whitlow6-1, 6-0
2025-08-02vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 20
W#2 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Jennifer Hoy6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTina Smith vs Meghan Whitlow6-0, 6-2
2025-07-28vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 21
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Nickerson vs Elizabeth Yanik4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesNiki Moss vs Meghan Whitlow6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTina Smith vs Lindsey Burchett6-3, 6-3
2025-07-24vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 21
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Elizabeth Yanik6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnna Marino vs Jennifer Hoy6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMary Mason Boaz vs Allyson Foster6-0, 6-0
2025-07-16vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnna Marino vs Elizabeth Yanik6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCharlotte Nickerson vs Allyson Foster6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMary Mason Boaz vs Jennifer Hoy6-4, 6-3
2025-06-18vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 21
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Amanda Fredericks2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Jennifer Hoy6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAnna Marino vs Lindsey Burchett6-1, 6-3
2025-06-04vs KY/LEX/Foster/DavisWon 10
W#2 SinglesNiki Moss vs Meghan Whitlow7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 (Singles) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Allison Moreman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.33
Anna Marino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Niki Moss
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.23
Charlotte Nickerson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Mary Mason Boaz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tina Smith
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Moss + Anna Marino3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Moreman
34W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Anna Marino
21W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Niki Moss
14W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
3
Charlotte Nickerson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Mary Mason Boaz
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Smith
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.