Teams

Digaetano/JB/3Oaks

2026 Tri-Level 55 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Digaetano/JB/3Oaks000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Ruth Owens
published
3.58
Carol Jones
published 4
3.27
Lorie Whitby
published
3.20
Leah Willett
published
2.74
2.70
Ellen Lawrence
published 2.5
2.70
Joan Khilling
published
2.69
Tanya Ellington
published
2.66
Shelly Little
published
2.60
Deana Muegge
published 3
Susa Digaetano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Jones + Ruth Owens10361% games−0.4% vs expected
Jacqueline Gammill + Tanya Ellington41244% games−0.4% vs expected
Shelly Little + Ellen Lawrence303 matchesnot enough data
Deana Muegge + Joan Khilling123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Owens
23W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Carol Jones
24W–22L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Lorie Whitby
28W–28L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Leah Willett
17W–31L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Jacqueline Gammill
9W–23L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Ellen Lawrence
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.70
Joan Khilling
14W–27L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.70
Tanya Ellington
8W–27L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Shelly Little
4W–17L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Deana Muegge
17W–17L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Susa Digaetano
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.