Teams

Lucky Rackettes

2024 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.78 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Hannah Yoo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-20vs Net AssetsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Winny Zhang vs Regina Farrington / Lisa Means6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Cintya Leveque vs Maureen Cook / Loan Nguyen6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-15vs PapadropshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesValerie Ciccone / Kristina Leary vs Mary Beth Etherton / Laura McInerney7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCintya Leveque / Hannah Yoo vs Annie Carey / Robin Khan6-4, 6-3
2024-03-06vs MaciaLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Chanpen Teeranon vs Luci del Aguila / Elizabeth Hunter4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-04vs The MojitosWon 20
W#2 DoublesZheng Dong / Kanika Sabor vs Linda Gowen / Melissa Hayes-Gehrke6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichele Brammer / Kara Stegeman vs Darcie Hammer / Kara Singh6-3, 6-1
2024-02-27vs RubinoLost 02
L#2 DoublesCintya Leveque / Sherida van Bochove vs Zoie Acadia / Carolyn Greis1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKara Stegeman / Michele Brammer vs Penelope Bell / Michelle Stas1-6, 4-6
2024-02-21vs Happy Feet 7.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristina Leary / Valerie Ciccone vs Katya White / Desiree Drakakis6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-02-14vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Kerry Spicer vs Li Ives / Lisa Schneiderman7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-02-07vs PapadropshotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Brammer / Kara Stegeman vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Joanne Rome6-3, 6-3
2024-01-24vs MaciaWon 10
W#3 DoublesKanika Sabor / Sherida van Bochove vs Luci del Aguila / Betsy Mencher6-0, 6-1
2024-01-17vs The MojitosWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristina Leary / Erin Newsome Moltz vs Rosemary Gwynn / Cecilia Jones6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesValerie Ciccone / Kerry Spicer vs Darcie Hammer / Polyxena Speros3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-10vs RubinoLost 02
L#2 DoublesValerie Ciccone / Kanika Sabor vs Zoie Acadia / Carolyn Greis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChanpen Teeranon / Sherida van Bochove vs Kasey Kinney / Katya Vert-Wong2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Kanika Sabor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Michele Brammer
published
3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.77
Zheng Dong
published 4
3.75
Layna Kelly
published
3.73
Shan Wang
published
3.73
Winny Zhang
published
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Valerie Ciccone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Kirah Yen
published
3.60
Kristina Leary
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Cintya Leveque
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Corinne Hart
published 3.5
3.36
Kerry Spicer
published
3.31
Hannah Yoo
published
3.30
Erin Newsome Moltz
published
3.28
Sarah Speirs
published
3.23
Elizabeth Hok
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Kara Stegeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jessica Lee
published
Sherida van Bochove
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chanpen Teeranon + Valerie Ciccone3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kanika Sabor
128W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.16
Lucy Wang
34W–15L career · no lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Zheng Dong
80W–38L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Layna Kelly
39W–19L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Valerie Ciccone
131W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Kirah Yen
39W–29L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Kristina Leary
272W–166L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–231L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Corinne Hart
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
Hannah Yoo
93W–73L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.30
Sarah Speirs
34W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Elizabeth Hok
123W–134L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Kara Stegeman
81W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.21
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherida van Bochove
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.