Teams

CCO Aces - McLellan

2025 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-08vs FK Big Shots - LongSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Sievers / CARMEL CONNOR vs Oksana Velis / Cindy Hinton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesFrances Ramirez vs Cameron Swaggerty6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEllen Smith / Betsy Calder vs Georgina Bumpas / NANCY TUTEN6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMargie McLellan / Kristen Holland vs Raksha Ramkissoon / Leslie Priest6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Mary Sievers vs Beth Dellovade / Hayley Creasey- Rogers6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSusie Friedland vs Sarah Osian0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMargie McLellan / Frances Ramirez vs Olga Mosteller / Carina Gandiongco6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Davis / Danielle Bouvier vs Kelli Ditty / Jane Ryals6-2, 6-2
2025-06-01vs Marion/Greene/40&over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Smith / CARMEL CONNOR vs Michelle Burns / Marisa Rodriguez4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSusie Friedland vs Jholie Lawrence6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKendall Mora / Frances Ramirez vs Janet Greene / Lauren Joyce3-6, 3-6
2025-05-18vs FK Fire That Shot (FTS) - BlackertSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMary Stevens / Kristen Holland vs Cyndee Blackert / Caressa Gray3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFrances Ramirez vs Sarah Osian2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Smith / Betsy Calder vs Lynn Crowe / Sophia Crawley6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargie McLellan / Mary Sievers vs Desi Leibfried / JENNIFER PETRELLA1-0
2025-05-05vs FK Fire That Shot (FTS) - BlackertSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDanielle Bouvier / Ellen Smith vs Cyndee Blackert / Caressa Gray4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDonita Hearns vs Sarah Osian1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Stevens / Kristen Holland vs Michelle Beck / Tatyana Liversedge6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFrances Ramirez / Kendall Mora vs Carina Gandiongco / Lynn Crowe6-2, 6-3
2025-04-25vs FK Big Shots - LongSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCARMEL CONNOR / Mary Meek vs Barbara Center / Cindy Hinton6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSusie Friedland vs Gretta Payne1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Sievers / Kristen Holland vs Sherry Louise Gronlund / Joan Matlock6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJenny Koch / Danielle Bouvier vs NANCY TUTEN / Denise Greer3-6, 3-6
2025-04-18vs FK Big Shots - LongWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Meek / Donna Davis vs Cameron Swaggerty / Jolinda Fisher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDonita Hearns vs Lisa Briggs4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCARMEL CONNOR / Margie McLellan vs Joan Matlock / Cindy Hinton6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Smith / Kristen Holland vs BETH ARMS / Denise Greer6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Mary Meek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Kristen Holland
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Mary Sievers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Margie McLellan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Susie Friedland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Donna Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Betsy Calder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Kendall Mora
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Frances Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
CARMEL CONNOR
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Donita Hearns
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Danielle Bouvier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jenny Koch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stevens + CARMEL CONNOR123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Meek
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kristen Holland
29W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Mary Sievers
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Margie McLellan
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Susie Friedland
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Donna Davis
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Betsy Calder
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Kendall Mora
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Frances Ramirez
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
CARMEL CONNOR
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Donita Hearns
9W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Danielle Bouvier
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Koch
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Stevens
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.