Teams

Viera - Hopkins

2023 Brevard Trilevel · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-02vs Rockledge - HartnettWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarcus Bennett / Nico San Nicolas vs Eddie White / Elliott Hulscher6-3, 6-2
2023-09-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesCory Spern / Nico San Nicolas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-18vs Suntree - CarverLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcus Bennett / Nico San Nicolas vs Thomas Tolles / David Carver4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElliott Hogans / Rob Barham vs William Honaker / Kyle McIntosh2-6, 2-6
2023-08-28vs Brevard/Flores/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNico San Nicolas / Duncan Ricci vs Daniel Flores / Gregory Kupi6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoel Hopkins / Elliott Hogans vs Trey Crowley / Zach Dahl2-6, 4-6
2023-08-21vs Rockledge - HartnettWon 20
W#1 DoublesNico San Nicolas / Marcus Bennett vs Eddie White / Andy McConnell6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoel Hopkins / Elliott Hogans vs John Donovan / Jay Amburgey6-3, 6-1
2023-08-15vs Fee - AcquavivaWon 20
W#1 DoublesNico San Nicolas / Marcus Bennett vs Paul Fitzgerald / Ricardo Cortez5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElliott Hogans / Joel Hopkins vs Juan Restrepo / Marcus Lumpkin6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Duncan Ricci
published 4.5
3.94
Nick DeFile
published
3.83
Nico San Nicolas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Elliott Hogans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Joel Hopkins
published
3.22
Matt Thurner
published
3.19
Rob Barham
published
3.17
Vincent Vo
published
3.06
Jamin Campbell
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nico San Nicolas + Elliott Hogans2344% gamesnot enough data
Rob Barham + Vincent Vo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Duncan Ricci
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
Nick DeFile
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Nico San Nicolas
42W–32L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Elliott Hogans
139W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Joel Hopkins
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Matt Thurner
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Rob Barham
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Vincent Vo
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Jamin Campbell
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.