Teams

10S Stars

2024 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 6.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-05vs Serves You RightLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoxy Castner / Robin Carlton vs Elba Sisco / Amy Lazarus2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeverly Bounds / Jeannie Cross vs Patricia Wendling / Cindy Paterson1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Buck / LindaFaye Pratt vs Lynn Pinaroc / Cindy Morrison6-2, 6-1
2024-05-29vs Between the LinesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Beverly Bounds vs Laura McNew / Helen Kasper6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Buck / Roxy Castner vs Janet Reece / Marilyn Morris0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJackie Nazim / Gay Harris vs Paula Chavez / Joan Kane0-6, 6-7
2024-05-15vs OKC: 55 Shades of GrayLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Roxy Castner vs Dana Stone / Nancy Anthony4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Jeannie Cross vs Helen Dailey / Vicky MARTIN3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Carlton / Sharyl Allen vs Kelly Hayes / Nikola Puffinbarger1-6, 5-7
2024-05-01vs Serves You RightWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Jeannie Cross vs Cindy Paterson / Patricia Wendling4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYvonne Gammon / Jackie Nazim vs Teresa Smith / Jennifer Cox6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Carlton / Sharyl Allen vs Lynn Pinaroc / Cindy Morrison6-3, 6-0
2024-04-24vs Between the LinesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosemary Scherer / Beverly Bounds vs Helen Kasper / Laura McNew6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSharyl Allen / Susan Bouzerand vs Marilyn Morris / Janet Reece1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJackie Nazim / Yvonne Gammon vs Susan Wall / Joan Kane2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-10vs OKC: 55 Shades of GrayLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Nazim / LindaFaye Pratt vs Treca Baetz / Niki McClintock2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharyl Allen / Susan Bouzerand vs Dana Stone / Carolyn Higganbotham3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeannie Cross / Beverly Bounds vs Nancy Anthony / Nikola Puffinbarger6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC: 55 Shades of Gray62141024188
210S Stars53141026224
3Slice of Life 5535111329219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Roxy Castner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Sharyl Allen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.69
Jackie Nazim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Beverly Bounds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Dianne Soltani
published 3
2.64
Rosemary Scherer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Jeannie Cross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Susan Bouzerand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Janet Buck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Robin Carlton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Gay Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Helen Swope
published 2.5
Cheryl Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
LindaFaye Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Yvonne Gammon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Soltani + Jeannie Cross6458% games+11.0% vs expected
Beverly Bounds + Jeannie Cross11952% games+3.1% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + Roxy Castner281755% games+1.7% vs expected
Dianne Soltani + Helen Swope13560% games+0.3% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + Robin Carlton1741% games−3.2% vs expected
Yvonne Gammon + Rosemary Scherer5351% games−4.2% vs expected
Jackie Nazim + LindaFaye Pratt5551% games−5.4% vs expected
Jeannie Cross + Sharyl Allen81345% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roxy Castner
143W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Sharyl Allen
51W–100L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Jackie Nazim
129W–136L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Beverly Bounds
33W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dianne Soltani
43W–28L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Rosemary Scherer
49W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Jeannie Cross
58W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.62
Susan Bouzerand
53W–139L career · 6 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Janet Buck
56W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Robin Carlton
26W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
3
Gay Harris
27W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Helen Swope
26W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
0
Cheryl Williams
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
LindaFaye Pratt
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yvonne Gammon
25W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.