Teams

Jackson Racquets

2023 WY Tri-Level · Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Cuddie / Judith Kaelber vs Jenny May / Renee Havens6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheri Witz / Joy Bowles vs Mimi Freymann / Kelly Matthews6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Shelley Olson vs Sara van Genderen / Cathleen French6-4, 6-0
2023-07-12vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie vs Jenny May / Kelsey Pedersen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Joy Bowles vs Renee Havens / Diane McGee6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShelley Olson / Megan Jenkins vs Kelly Matthews / Sara van Genderen1-6, 1-6
2023-07-05vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJudith Kaelber / Ellen Fales vs Jenny May / Kelsey Pedersen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheri Witz / Anne Moran vs Mimi Freymann / Jennifer Mei6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMiranda Hoover / Shelley Olson vs Melinda Day / MacKenzie Krall6-2, 6-4
2023-06-28vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Cuddie / Heather Silverman vs Mimi Freymann / Jennifer Mei6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnne Moran / Ellen Fales vs Kelsey Pedersen / Kelly Matthews6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Milligan / Miranda Hoover vs Melinda Day / Libby Erker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-21vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Kaelber / Heather Silverman vs Renee Havens / Jennifer Mei6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Cheri Witz vs Mimi Freymann / Diane McGee6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKelly Milligan / Megan Jenkins vs Libby Erker / Sara van Genderen6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-19vs The Teton TopspinnersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudith Kaelber / Laura Cuddie vs Jenny May / Diane McGee6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Anne Moran vs Melinda Day / Renee Havens6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Milligan / Miranda Hoover vs Cathleen French / Kelly Matthews6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Jackson Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Heather Silverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Miranda Hoover
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Anne Moran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ellen Fales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Cheri Witz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Linda Merigliano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Joy Bowles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Kelly Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Judith Kaelber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Cuddie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Jenkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelley Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Kaelber + Laura Cuddie4168% games−2.1% vs expected
Heather Silverman + Judith Kaelber4160% gamesnot enough data
Heather Silverman + Kelly Milligan123 matchesnot enough data
Judith Kaelber + Linda Merigliano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Silverman
83W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4
Miranda Hoover
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Anne Moran
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ellen Fales
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cheri Witz
31W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Linda Merigliano
50W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Joy Bowles
50W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kelly Milligan
38W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Judith Kaelber
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Cuddie
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Jenkins
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Olson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.