Teams

FYC - VanderHeyden

2022 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-02-26vs Eagle Harbor - MatulonisLost 01
L#4 DoublesChildress Lee / Paul VanderHeyden vs Doug Aiosa / Colt Reiswig3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#4 DoublesGerald Howell / Paul VanderHeyden vs Valadi Srinivasan / Ananth Kavaseri6-3, 6-4
2022-02-12vs Jax GolfLost 01
L#4 DoublesPaul VanderHeyden / Lonnie Myler vs Jason Patnaude / John Eberhardt4-6, 4-6
2022-02-09vs Sawgrass - PontigoWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul VanderHeyden / Lonnie Myler vs Michael Orenchuk / Donald Mayer6-1, 6-2
2022-01-31vs Magnolia Point - CaileLost 01
L#4 DoublesLonnie Myler / Paul VanderHeyden vs Carey Caile / John Barnes3-6, 2-6
2022-01-25vs San Jose - CumbowWon 10
W#4 DoublesPaul VanderHeyden / Lonnie Myler vs Abe Dopazo / Andrew Lebet5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-15vs Duval/Jackson (Williams Y)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChildress Lee / Paul VanderHeyden vs Daniel Nicolas / Erik Kasper3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Karl Greiner
published
3.14
Ryan Chandler
published
2.92
Andy Culver
published 3
2.89
Greg Merritt
published 3
2.84
James Racine
published 3
2.66
Lonnie Myler
published
2.54
Childress Lee
published 3
2.38
Paul VanderHeyden
usually #4 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.32
Nathan Rogers
published
George Sollitt
published 2.5
Ron Pellum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Merritt + Karl Greiner5256% games+4.2% vs expected
Paul VanderHeyden + Lonnie Myler1632% games−6.4% vs expected
James Racine + Greg Merritt033 matchesnot enough data
James Racine + Nathan Rogers123 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Chandler + Karl Greiner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karl Greiner
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Ryan Chandler
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Andy Culver
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Greg Merritt
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
James Racine
19W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Lonnie Myler
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Childress Lee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Paul VanderHeyden
30W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38
Nathan Rogers
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32
2.5
George Sollitt
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Pellum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.