Teams

Wu/Ulin

2025 18&Over Non-Advancing · 2.5-3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-04vs Moukad/IeniLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Liu / Jiao Li vs Melanie Petsch / Emily Louie6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJody Popple vs Kathryn Gayner4-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Kay / Katy Wang vs Ching-lynn Chen / Espinosa Maria del Mar4-6, 4-4
2025-11-24vs IshizawaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAbby Ziluca / Daily Lambert vs Rie Bohn / Jane Yakubovich6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCynthia Wasserberger vs CARLA GALLARDO6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlicia Ulin / Alexandra Kay vs Tetiana Sears / Sunayna Samtani3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-16vs Carey/ReyWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Liu / H Rasandiharisoa vs Emma Trenchard / Chanel Griffiths7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlicia Ulin vs Ivy Zhang6-4, 5-2
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Prohovich / Jody Popple vs Katie Wagner / Caroline Flandrin6-1, 6-4
2025-11-05vs Moukad/IeniLost 12
L#1 DoublesJiao Li / Carolyn Prohovich vs Rosemary Moukad / Lucy Dew6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCynthia Wasserberger vs Mary Gu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Toth / Tani Sanghvi vs Ching-lynn Chen / Edwina Wong1-6, 0-6
2025-10-30vs IshizawaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Cook / Ashley Toth vs Fumie Ishizawa / Rie Bohn2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJody Popple vs Kavitha Shastry2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole LeFever / Lorena Esparragoza vs Keiko Kita / Takako Kawana0-6, 1-6
2025-10-23vs Carey/ReyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaily Lambert / Abby Ziluca vs Dina Bassin / Miriam Rey6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJiao Li vs Fei Song4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJody Popple / Carolyn Prohovich vs Alexa Rissoff / Katie Wagner6-2, 6-0
2025-10-15vs Moukad/IeniSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Wu / LiJun Gan vs Mary Gu / Catherine Hebert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCynthia Wasserberger vs Kathryn Gayner6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-05vs IshizawaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLiJun Gan / Susan Wu vs Marilyn Wong / Sandra Wang2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLorena Esparragoza / Linda Liu vs Keiko Kita / Sunayna Samtani6-3, 6-4
2025-09-29vs Carey/ReyLost 03
L#1 DoublesH Rasandiharisoa / Jiao Li vs Miriam Rey / Caroline Flandrin1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Prohovich vs Fei Song3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLorena Esparragoza / LiJun Gan vs Katie Wagner / Yuna Gu4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5-3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Carey/Rey0917922219
2Moukad/Ieni09131230232
3Wu/Ulin09121432256
4Ishizawa0991636247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Abby Ziluca
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Alicia Ulin
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.77
Linda Liu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Cynthia Wasserberger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Alexandra Kay
published 3
Daily Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Jody Popple
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Carolyn Prohovich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Jiao Li
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.49
Ashley Toth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.29
Lorena Esparragoza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
H Rasandiharisoa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Danziger
published
Katy Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
LiJun Gan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Ziluca + Daily Lambert12262% games+17.2% vs expected
Jody Popple + Carolyn Prohovich3255% games+11.9% vs expected
Alicia Ulin + Katie Danziger2348% games+2.8% vs expected
Katie Danziger + Ashley Toth303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Danziger + Cynthia Wasserberger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abby Ziluca
21W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Alicia Ulin
42W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Linda Liu
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cynthia Wasserberger
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Alexandra Kay
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daily Lambert
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jody Popple
16W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Carolyn Prohovich
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
Jiao Li
12W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Ashley Toth
12W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Lorena Esparragoza
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29
H Rasandiharisoa
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Danziger
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katy Wang
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
LiJun Gan
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.