Teams

SAT Ossman/Nashville

2025 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Women - FRI AM

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-26vs Hollis/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Geno / Allison McNeely vs Conde Devine / Lisa Wallace6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Carbonari / Cindy Mccullough vs Dana Griscom / Kathryn Harlan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Burt / Janet Adamson vs Karen Adams / Celia Turner6-3, 6-4
2025-04-22vs DeMouy/Petrin/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Carbonari / Cindy Mccullough vs Dawn Nelson / Michelle Salada6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Burt / Melissa Geno vs Sue Collins / Joann Covington6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Krueger / Lora Fox vs Donna Demouy / Rhonda Petrin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Hollis/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Eudaley / Thalia Kahl vs Regina Nutter / Lisa Wallace3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Janet Prentice vs Conde Devine / Kathryn Harlan4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Allison McNeely vs Vicki Archer / Marie Hope Kirkland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-05vs DeMouy/Petrin/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Geno / Lynn Krueger vs Cynthia Evans / Becky Husi6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Kathleen Carbonari vs Rebecca Smith / Susan Spieth6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Allison McNeely vs Dawn Nelson / Dottie Pope7-5, 6-2
2025-03-29vs Walker/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLora Fox / Dawn Burt vs Joni Covington / Julie Shaub6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Geno / Lynn Krueger vs Sally Wrather / Debbi Booton7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaura Fitzgerald / Allison McNeely vs Barbara Grubbs / Jane Crenshaw1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Capeling/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesClair Cochran / Janet Prentice vs Bernadette Glasgow / Robin Gilliam6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Krueger / Melissa Geno vs Tanya Capeling / Allison Wright6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThalia Kahl / Allison McNeely vs Christy Sallee / Dodson Randolph3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Hooper/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Carbonari / Cindy Mccullough vs Barbara Hooper / Kathleen Doulin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Adamson / Melissa Geno vs Vonda Darr / Cindy Knapp4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAllison McNeely / Maura Fitzgerald vs Lynne Anderson / Lolo Fuhrman2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Kathleen Carbonari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Dawn Burt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Lora Fox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Brenda Ossman
published 4
Clair Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Allison McNeely
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Maura Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Melissa Geno
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Lynn Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Janet Prentice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Eudaley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari19364% games+5.4% vs expected
Allison McNeely + Maura Fitzgerald3252% games+0.0% vs expected
Melissa Geno + Lynn Krueger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
54W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Dawn Burt
26W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Lora Fox
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Clair Cochran
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Allison McNeely
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
Maura Fitzgerald
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Melissa Geno
9W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Lynn Krueger
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Janet Prentice
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Patricia Eudaley
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.