Teams

Ch.Kopp40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-09vs Jo.Zorzi40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Maynard / Kathryn Shields vs Megan Black / Veronica Glass3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-04vs Pa.Cochran40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Simpson / Emy Hanson vs Lisa Lathram / Mary Ann Enzweiler3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-28vs Ch.Burr40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Maynard / Kathryn Shields vs Jennifer Taylor / Hope Graney6-3, 6-1
2024-08-20vs Me.Ferrell40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesHolly Camak / Emy Hanson vs Sarah McAdams / Patricia Weston6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Maynard / Kathryn Shields vs Rebecca Hancock / Shade Maret6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.26
Melissa Graham
published
3.26
Brooke Abee
published 3.5
3.19
Crystal Smith
published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Simpson
published
3.00
Zoe Whitesell
published
2.98
Emy Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
2.82
Emily Best
published 3
2.81
Mandi Chappell
published 3
2.77
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jerri Lemanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Simpson + Charlotte Kopp123 matchesnot enough data
Mandi Chappell + Emy Hanson213 matchesnot enough data
Mandi Chappell + Kathryn Shields123 matchesnot enough data
Charlotte Kopp + Emily Best123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Melissa Graham
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Brooke Abee
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Crystal Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Stephanie Simpson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Zoe Whitesell
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Emy Hanson
65W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Inma Navarro Galisteo
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Emily Best
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Mandi Chappell
65W–63L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.