Teams

KTC Carpenter

2025 OH OV SUMMER A55&O Dayton · 2025 SUMMER Career A 55&O 9.0W Dayton

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Alcorn / Kristin Carpenter vs Monica Hawkins / Mary Whiting6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Corbean / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Lunilia Crespo / Patricia Gilmore7-5, 6-2
2025-07-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Carpenter / Miho Morris vs Sonja Johannes / Alicia Schneider6-3, 6-1
2025-06-27vs KTC ZahorianWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Diane Rumpke vs Garri Carter / Mary Whiting6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Alcorn / Kristin Carpenter vs Caryn Caldwell / Tammy Kessler6-0, 6-0
2025-06-20vs KTC ZahorianWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Carpenter / Cindy Alcorn vs Sherri Zahorian / Tammy Kessler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Diehl / Samantha Enslen vs Joyce Yates / Alicia Schneider6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVida McDowell / Miho Morris vs Garri Carter / Susan Smith6-0, 6-4
2025-06-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Kelly Fackel vs Sonja Johannes / Patricia Gilmore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Diehl / Miho Morris vs Alicia Schneider / Joyce Yates6-1, 6-1
2025-06-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Fackel / Diane Rumpke vs Patricia Gilmore / Sonja Johannes6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Kuhle / Lisa Corbean vs Monica Standley / Susan Smith6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Donna Diehl vs Lunilia Crespo / Carol Poe7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SUMMER Career A 55&O 9.0W Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Alcorn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Kelly Fackel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Miho Morris
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Renuka Dewan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.07
Elizabeth Kuhle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Lisa Corbean
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.03
Samantha Enslen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.82
Vida McDowell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Diane Rumpke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Ginny Boeckman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Donna Diehl
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristin Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Alcorn + Kristin Carpenter12077% games+16.4% vs expected
Renuka Dewan + Samantha Enslen141749% games−2.2% vs expected
Kelly Fackel + Lisa Corbean7359% games−8.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Kuhle + Lisa Corbean5063% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Corbean + Ginny Boeckman404 matchesnot enough data
Vida McDowell + Ginny Boeckman123 matchesnot enough data
Renuka Dewan + Miho Morris213 matchesnot enough data
Donna Diehl + Kristin Carpenter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Alcorn
14W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Fackel
81W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Miho Morris
33W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Renuka Dewan
102W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Elizabeth Kuhle
77W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Lisa Corbean
93W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Samantha Enslen
81W–96L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Vida McDowell
31W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Diane Rumpke
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ginny Boeckman
35W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Donna Diehl
32W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Carpenter
26W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.