Teams

PD65/Trexler/FTC

2025 Adult Combo 65 & Over-PD · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-05vs PD65/Quick/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita White / Gee Whetsel vs Jeannie Gainey / Kellie Braddock6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandy Trexler / Margaret Ann Mansell vs Linda Freeman / Ellen Berry6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJill McMillan / Linda Getty vs Jayne Boswell / Warner Rogers7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-28vs PD65/Quick/FTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Getty / Kathleen Stedman vs Rita Wilhelm / Nancy Moore1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Dukes / Jill McMillan vs Jeannie Gainey / Warner Rogers7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGee Whetsel / Anita White vs Jayne Boswell / Linda Freeman4-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs PD65/Quick/FTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Dukes / Sandy Trexler vs Nancy Moore / Rita Wilhelm3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Ann Mansell / Kathleen Stedman vs Linda Freeman / Angela Lorenz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGee Whetsel / Anita White vs Audrey Hyman / Deborah Griggs6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-11vs PD65/Quick/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Trexler / Lynn Dukes vs Ellen Berry / Linda Cox6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Player / Pamela Weinberg vs Linda Freeman / Angela Lorenz6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJosephine Killham / Anita White vs Nancy Moore / Rita Wilhelm2-6, 5-7
2025-08-28vs PD65/Quick/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie Player / Pamela Weinberg vs Linda Freeman / Angela Lorenz4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Trexler / Linda Getty vs Nancy Moore / Rita Wilhelm6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJosephine Killham / Janet Coles-James vs Linda Cox / Jennifer Edwards6-4, 6-2
2025-08-21vs PD65/Quick/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMerryn Weaver / Jill McMillan vs Rita Wilhelm / Linda Freeman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarie Player / Pamela Weinberg vs Angela Lorenz / Deborah Griggs6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Coles-James / Anita White vs Audrey Hyman / Warner Rogers0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-14vs PD65/Quick/FTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarie Player / Pamela Weinberg vs Terrie Reames / Jeannie Gainey6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSandy Trexler / Margaret Ann Mansell vs Deborah Griggs / Angela Lorenz4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnita White / Linda Getty vs Jayne Boswell / Linda Cox6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Marie Player
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Margaret Ann Mansell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Merryn Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Lynn Dukes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Gee Whetsel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Janet Coles-James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Anita White
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.93
Jill McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Kathleen Stedman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Pamela Weinberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Sandy Trexler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Josephine Killham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Getty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Player + Pamela Weinberg8259% games+4.6% vs expected
Josephine Killham + Anita White4254% games−0.1% vs expected
Merryn Weaver + Gee Whetsel5254% games−1.9% vs expected
Pamela Weinberg + Jill McMillan6253% games−8.2% vs expected
Gee Whetsel + Anita White224 matchesnot enough data
Merryn Weaver + Jill McMillan123 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Ann Mansell + Anita White303 matchesnot enough data
Janet Coles-James + Anita White123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marie Player
48W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
Margaret Ann Mansell
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Merryn Weaver
21W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lynn Dukes
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Gee Whetsel
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Janet Coles-James
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Anita White
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Jill McMillan
11W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Kathleen Stedman
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Pamela Weinberg
39W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.81
Josephine Killham
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Getty
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.