Teams

Storer - Not Racket Science: Smash Force Edition

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 6 played
Sep 9 8:00 PM
Aspen Hill Club
Sep 16 9:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
Sep 27 2:00 PM
Norbeck Country Club
2026-08-31vs Tennis Darlings - DullabhLost 03
L#1 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Kyung Haw Sung3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGail Ribas vs Stacey White1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJohanne Maher vs Hrachuhi Babayan2-6, 0-6
2026-08-23vs Aizpuru - On Thin AizWon 20
W#1 SinglesGail Poole-Vaughn vs Lindsey Trickett6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Shannon Thomas6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesVivian Garcia-Tunon vs Elizabeth McLeod6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRobin Rudowitz vs Jocelyn McDaniel6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLouise Smith vs Grace Gan6-7, 1-6
2026-08-12vs Tennis Darlings - DullabhLost 03
L#1 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Prashila Dullabh2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGail Poole-Vaughn vs Stacey White1-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesLouise Smith vs Kyung Haw Sung0-6, 0-6
2026-08-02vs Aizpuru - On Thin AizWon 21
W#1 SinglesCaroline Storer vs Margaret Cornelius6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesErin Nguyen vs Dana Willard4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJohanne Maher vs Melissa Walker6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVivian Garcia-Tunon vs Jocelyn McDaniel6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLouise Smith vs Karina Perez4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJohanne Maher vs Irina Tsybina3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Darlings - Dullabh3193776
2Sharma - Ace Ace Baby (singles 3.0)22751190
3Storer - Not Racket Science: Smash Force Edition225714108
4Aizpuru - On Thin Aiz133919128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Vivian Garcia-Tunon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.03
Kelly Kennedy
published
3.03
Caroline Storer
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.90
Robin Rudowitz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Gail Poole-Vaughn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Louise Smith
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.71
Gail Ribas
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Erin Nguyen
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Johanne Maher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vivian Garcia-Tunon
27W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
Kelly Kennedy
71W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Caroline Storer
39W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Robin Rudowitz
25W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Gail Poole-Vaughn
91W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Louise Smith
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Gail Ribas
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Erin Nguyen
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Johanne Maher
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.