Teams

CTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Hartvigsen)

Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Mixed 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs CTL55/Allen/PKWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Ford / Anne Belue vs Robert White / M Brinkley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Hartvigsen / Robert Dozier vs Bob King / Doris Mosley6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDWIGHT SAWYER / Patricia Butler Fitch vs Judith Ray / Doug Cochran6-1, 6-1
2026-07-11vs CTL55/Sojourner/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesShirley Schoonover / Scott Prince vs Barbara Belquist / Tony Pfeiffer3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGeorge Kreese / Patricia Butler Fitch vs Kristen Sojourner / Robert Boland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Dozier / Cheryl Hartvigsen vs June MacKie / Mark Thompson6-2, 6-0
2026-07-10vs CTL55/Sojourner/CTFCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPhil Tollison / Juanita Cooney vs Barbara Belquist / Tony Pfeiffer1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Butler Fitch / George Kreese vs John Naylor / June MacKie6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Hartvigsen / Robert Dozier vs Robert Boland / Marybeth Meyers7-5, 6-1
2026-06-20vs CTL55/Allen/PKWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Prince / Beth Belcher vs Theresa Moore / Doug Cochran7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatricia Butler Fitch / George Kreese vs Robert White / Susan King6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Draffin / DWIGHT SAWYER vs Bob King / M Brinkley6-1, 6-2
2026-05-30vs CTL55/Allen/PKWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Belue / Keith Ringer vs Bob King / Susan King3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPhil Tollison / Juanita Cooney vs Doug Cochran / Tricia Gray4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Hartvigsen / George Kreese vs Judith Ray / Eric Sosa6-1, 6-3
2026-05-09vs CTL55/Sojourner/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Hartvigsen / David Ford vs Betsy Nunnery / Mark Thompson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Juanita Cooney vs David Bowen / Barbara Belquist7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGeorge Kreese / Shirley Schoonover vs Robert Boland / Marybeth Meyers3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 55 & Over Mixed 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL55/Sojourner/CTFC5112618153
2CTL (A) 3.0M 55 & Over (Hartvigsen)4212613122
3CTL55/Allen/PK0631532211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Robert Dozier
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.19
George Kreese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.16
Juanita Cooney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Phil Tollison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
DWIGHT SAWYER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
David Ford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Anne Belue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Patricia Butler Fitch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Beth Belcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Cheryl Hartvigsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Helen Austin
published 3
2.85
Scott Prince
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Anne Draffin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Keith Ringer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Shirley Schoonover
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rhonda Alexander
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juanita Cooney + Phil Tollison5264% games+6.9% vs expected
Cheryl Hartvigsen + Robert Dozier404 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Hartvigsen + Phil Tollison213 matchesnot enough data
George Kreese + Patricia Butler Fitch213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Belcher + Scott Prince303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Dozier
73W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
George Kreese
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.19
Juanita Cooney
91W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
Phil Tollison
44W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
DWIGHT SAWYER
62W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
David Ford
83W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Anne Belue
48W–21L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Patricia Butler Fitch
67W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Beth Belcher
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Cheryl Hartvigsen
123W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Helen Austin
48W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Scott Prince
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Anne Draffin
86W–42L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Keith Ringer
46W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Shirley Schoonover
137W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Rhonda Alexander
72W–94L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.