Teams

In.Navarro Galisteo18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-13vs Br.Humphrey18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Mary Long / Juliana Treleven6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Brittany Humphrey6-4, 6-2
2024-05-13vs De.Farmer18A3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Dr Amy Linder3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Mauzy / Lee Anne Oxford vs Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan / Kristen Gillispie4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Pa.Spell18AWon 21
W#2 DoublesKathryn Poole / Heather Mauzy vs Pamela Spell / Shana Lentz6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Carol Abercrombie6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine George / Caroline Beaird vs MacKenzie Green / Meghan OFerral6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs El.Wallace18AWon 21
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Allison Gupton6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKathryn Poole vs Paxton Sickler6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Meta Bartley vs Sallie Glover / Mary Ellen Crawley6-1, 6-1
2024-04-07vs Ke.O'Rourke18AWon 30
W#1 SinglesKathryn Poole vs Kelly O'Rourke6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Heather Mauzy vs Alise Fredrickson / Sofia Switzer6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Blair Burr6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24vs La.Triebert18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesLee Anne Oxford vs Griffin Lamb1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Lorraine Hall0-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs Am.Cuni18ALost 12
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Elizabeth Lindsay2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesInma Navarro Galisteo / Kathryn Poole vs Heidi McCann / Kay Bonavita6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMeta Bartley / Caroline Beaird vs Laura Lee Gillenwater / Courtney Phillips6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-03vs Na.Rodriguez18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarter Grimes / Kathryn Poole vs Lisa Mitalas / Natalie Rodriguez6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJerri Lemanski / Lee Anne Oxford vs Adair Sheppard / Sara Walker6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Kathryn Poole
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.94
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.78
Catherine George
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Janis McLaughlin
published
2.67
Ann Pershke
published 3
2.66
Carter Grimes
published 3
2.55
Caroline Beaird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jerri Lemanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+12.0% vs expected
Carter Grimes + Kathryn Poole044 matchesnot enough data
Carter Grimes + Dana Aderhold123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Beaird + Lee Anne Oxford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathryn Poole
64W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Lee Anne Oxford
83W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Inma Navarro Galisteo
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Catherine George
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Janis McLaughlin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Ann Pershke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Carter Grimes
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Caroline Beaird
46W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.