Teams

6 ACAC Carter

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-17vs 15 ACAC Delisio 3.5 MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Nalls / Jeffrey Johnson vs John Delisio / Gregory Cole5-7, 3-6
2022-05-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Nalls vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs 1 Belmont ArcaroWon 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Wilson / Brian Nalls vs Ashleigh Moody / Nicholas Arcaro6-1, 6-2
2022-04-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Nalls vs Matthew Branson6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
3.30
Jonathan Meade
published
3.30
Brian Nalls
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Jeffrey Foddrell
published
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.26
Stephen Chandler
published
3.24
Thomas Wilson
published
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
2.94
Eric Carter
published 3.5
Mark Carter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randolph Moore + Thomas Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Jonathan Meade
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Brian Nalls
139W–113L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jeffrey Foddrell
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Thomas Wilson
24W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Eric Carter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
Mark Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.