Teams

Knight-Cypress Hills

2026 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-05vs Allred-3.5-SWWon 32
L#1 DoublesCHRIS BOYKIN / Zachary Harris vs Harrison Warren / Shawn Thompson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTurner Hughes vs Brandon Allred6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJay Knight / ROBERT LEBLANC vs Austin Heard / Brayden Mabry5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSmith Lyon vs Greg Ryan7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDylan Matthews / Judd Williams vs Christopher Mays / Dwain Perkins7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Allred-3.5-SWLost 23
L#1 DoublesKenneth Wells / Jay Knight vs Greg Ryan / Christopher Mays3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHayes Miler vs Harrison Warren5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Little / Jeffery Suber vs Shawn Thompson / Brandon Allred6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesCarl Pete Nimrod vs Brayden Mabry4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCHRIS BOYKIN / Zachary Harris vs Dwain Perkins / Austin Heard7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-04vs Allred-3.5-SWWon 21
L#1 DoublesKenneth Milton / Michael Murphy vs Brandon Allred / Shawn Thompson4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCarl Pete Nimrod vs Harrison Warren7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHayes Miler vs Brayden Mabry6-4, 7-6
2026-04-04vs Allred-3.5-SWWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffery Suber / Michael Murphy vs Greg Ryan / Christopher Mays7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Little vs Brayden Mabry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knight-Cypress Hills3114615166
2Allred-3.5-SW1361431227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jay Knight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Carl Pete Nimrod
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeffery Suber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Turner Hughes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Benjamin Little
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Kenneth Milton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Hayes Miler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Dylan Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Judd Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
CHRIS BOYKIN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kenneth Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Smith Lyon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Knight + Carl Pete Nimrod224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jay Knight
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Carl Pete Nimrod
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Jeffery Suber
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Turner Hughes
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Benjamin Little
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Kenneth Milton
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Hayes Miler
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Dylan Matthews
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Judd Williams
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
CHRIS BOYKIN
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kenneth Wells
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Smith Lyon
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.