Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Camille Freeman
published 3.5
3.45
Meaghan Sterk
published
3.43
Amy Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Twinee Madan
published
3.37
Sonia Whitfield
published
3.33
Gail Fong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Susan Onffroy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lexi He
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Flora Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Lauren Roseman
published
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nelly Eunhee Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Inna Cantor
published
3.04
Carolyn Harnish
published 3
3.02
Hayley Charnaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Corrine Fabie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Vera Parengkuan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Arlene Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Zhen Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Erna Nishime
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Sarah Arjomand
published
2.75
Michelle Angel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katrina Heiles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inna Cantor + Susan Onffroy2347% games−12.2% vs expected
Gail Fong + Susan Onffroy213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Angel + Hayley Charnaw303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Camille Freeman
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Meaghan Sterk
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Amy Li
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Twinee Madan
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Sonia Whitfield
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Susan Onffroy
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lexi He
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Flora Li
15W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Lauren Roseman
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Nelly Eunhee Park
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Inna Cantor
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Carolyn Harnish
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Hayley Charnaw
23W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3.5
Corrine Fabie
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Vera Parengkuan
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Arlene Wu
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Zhen Liu
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Sarah Arjomand
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Michelle Angel
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Katrina Heiles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.