Teams

CGM-Fredericksen/Peters

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results5 ties
2019-06-30Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTrish Peters / Heidi Palena vs Christine Irwin / Susan Lindahl6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Angie O'Leary vs Barbara Friesen / Cara Hallock6-2, 6-3
2019-06-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeidi Palena / Alana Rhea vs Karen Simon / Kathi Hermanski3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-06-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeidi Palena / Trish Peters vs Megan Clifford / Theresa Hagerty6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2019-05-11Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMargaret Huck / Heidi Palena vs Christie Herkert / Jennifer Johnson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlana Rhea / Carin Riley vs Minda Garvens / Andria Shirk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-05-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Huck / Alana Rhea vs Becky Holzman / Tove Maloco6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.