Teams

SGraff.40.6.5C-Dur

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
Sep 23 7:00 PM
Hardscrabble
2026-09-02vs KRyan-HVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Franks / Kari Lovetinsky vs Ruth Caccavale / Barbara Wilhelm6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristi Laan / Abigail Weaver vs Emma Schaufele / Stephanie Perun6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKinsey Wennerstrom / Elizabeth Chan vs Marcy Casp / Kathleen Remmer6-1, 6-0
2026-08-26vs LGilchrist-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarli Eller / Kristin Isaacs vs Cynthia Cross / Kristina Vrabel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Franks / MaryJo McNeill vs Laurie Rechholtz / Laura Porter6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Hellner / Kristi Laan vs Elizabeth Faber / Miriam Treggiari6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Chan / Sara Lawrence vs Anne Stephens / Lisa Simmons6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Franks / Courtney Carey vs Eve Hammett / Ann Flodin6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Muth Humphreys / Susan Graff vs Erin McElligott / Laura Caldwell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-12vs SStowe.40.6.5C-SVCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Franks / Dr Amy Linder vs Meimei Wessinger / Joan St Laurent6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristi Laan / Susan Graff vs Holly Santago / Emily Ryan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Chan / Courtney Carey vs Sandra Stowe / Donna Misa6-0, 6-4
2026-08-05vs KMcWhorter-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesKarli Eller / Kristin Isaacs vs Kristin Cooley / Courtney Mills6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Muth Humphreys / Mary Hellner vs Kim McWhorter / Judy Faubert4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Laan / Kari Lovetinsky vs Loralie Bible / Jessica Nagy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MGriffiths-CHTC3090135
2KMcWhorter-DUR3081234
3RDavis-CHTC2060030
4LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC2163656
5MKuehn-DFC2163880
6SStowe.40.6.5C-SVC2154855
7SGraff.40.6.5C-Dur2163978
8JDeConto.40.6.5C-DUR2154972
9TStefan-HS1133652
10MFulton-UNC12361391
11CMurray-HR12271486
12GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH02151066
13LGilchrist-CHCC03271499
14KRyan-HVCC031817105
15SBartle.40C-DUR030918112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Elizabeth Chan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.57
Karli Eller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Franks
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.32
Kristi Laan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Lauren Muth Humphreys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Dr Amy Linder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Abigail Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Susan Graff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Kristin Isaacs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
MaryJo McNeill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Courtney Carey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Mary Hellner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kinsey Wennerstrom + Susan Graff6257% games+10.5% vs expected
Susan Graff + Lauren Muth Humphreys4155% games+8.2% vs expected
Courtney Carey + Kristin Isaacs4652% gamesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Kristi Laan4548% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Wennerstrom + Lauren Muth Humphreys6161% gamesnot enough data
Kristi Laan + Karli Eller4351% gamesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Kristin Isaacs2344% gamesnot enough data
Kinsey Wennerstrom + Kristin Isaacs3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Chan
49W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Karli Eller
163W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Sarah Franks
79W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–182L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lauren Muth Humphreys
112W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Dr Amy Linder
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Abigail Weaver
18W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
Susan Graff
43W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
MaryJo McNeill
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Courtney Carey
188W–154L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Mary Hellner
55W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.