Teams

Lovelace/META

2025 Adult 18 & Over-META · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-15vs Adams/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Bozman / Dana Wenzell vs Morgan Scott / Raegan Goodson1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEve Little Bradford vs Sarah LaGuardia4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Dean / Rachel Lovelace vs Brittini Thacker / Anita Jilton0-6, 2-6
2025-04-14vs Adams/METALost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Scardo / Dana Wenzell vs Sandra Cook / Anita Jilton2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Lovelace / Pamela Prince-Eason vs Brittini Thacker / Kari Holt2-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs Adams/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesShanna Berry / Tiffany Scardo vs Holly Grammer / Sarah LaGuardia4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesOlivia Osborne vs Raegan Goodson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDana Wenzell / Regan Jordan vs Sandra Cook / Morgan Scott4-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs Adams/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Fogg / Sarah Nobles vs Brittini Thacker / Shannon Hinkle3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSoma Mukherjee vs Kari Holt6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Bozman / Jane Dean vs Anita Jilton / Morgan Scott3-6, 4-6
2025-03-27vs Adams/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Wenzell / Eve Little Bradford vs Anita Jilton / Sandra Cook6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSoma Mukherjee vs Sarah LaGuardia6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Scardo / Jane Dean vs Shannon Hinkle / Holly Grammer4-6, 1-6
2025-03-22vs Adams/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesRegan Jordan / Shanna Berry vs Raegan Goodson / Sarah LaGuardia3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesOlivia Osborne vs Morgan Scott6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSarah Nobles / Pamela Prince-Eason vs Holly Grammer / Kari Holt4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Soma Mukherjee
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.52
Shanna Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Rachel Fogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Holli Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Eve Little Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.11
Dana Wenzell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.09
Jane Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Regan Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Olivia Osborne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Pamela Prince-Eason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Lovelace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Bozman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Nobles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Scardo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regan Jordan + Dana Wenzell033 matchesnot enough data
Dana Wenzell + Holli Cox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Soma Mukherjee
16W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Shanna Berry
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Rachel Fogg
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Holli Cox
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Eve Little Bradford
25W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Dana Wenzell
6W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jane Dean
19W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
Regan Jordan
20W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Olivia Osborne
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Prince-Eason
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Lovelace
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Bozman
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Nobles
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Scardo
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.