← Teams

VTC-Wilcox/Gaylor

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.61 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lorna Goth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Alan Jones
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hapke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Teresa Darling
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Darling / Dean Gaylor vs Mary Hlady / Monte Gonzales6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Jones / Alan Jones vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Mark Beilstein6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Shella Razon-Lumetta / Pierre Burthey6-3, 7-6
2024-05-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Ramon Tuason vs Catherine Greenblatt / Murray Jansen6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKelley Gaylor / John Hapke vs Tom Grissom / Sarah Robertson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-05Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Jones / Alan Jones vs Paul Harwood / Kim Tellin6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRamon Tuason / Lorna Goth vs Susan Ford / Steve Elmer6-2, 6-4
2024-04-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLisa Provost / Lee Wilcox vs Andrea Vicino / Edmund Yuan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLorna Goth / John Hapke vs Chinwoo Kim / Patty Chen6-2, 6-2
2024-04-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Tony Humpage / Emily Qi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Jones / Stephanie Jones vs Robin Michalisko / Tamara Beecroft6-1, 5-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Lee Wilcox vs Simon Lofts / Catherine Lofts6-6
2024-04-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLee Wilcox / Lisa Provost vs Jing Li / Yongping Liu7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLorna Goth / John Hapke vs Ann Davidson / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDean Gaylor / Teresa Darling vs Lisa Cohns / Robert Cohns6-1, 6-3
2024-04-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Stephanie Jones vs Nozomi Bray / Steve Snyder6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDean Gaylor / Teresa Darling vs Kathy Ramsey / Jim Fisher6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / John Hapke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDean Gaylor / Teresa Darling vs Rachel Nies / Doyoung Moon4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Ramon Tuason vs Misug Kim / Daniel M Kim6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Sandie Yamauchi / Sy Cha6-7, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Lorna Goth
124W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.77
4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
Alan Jones
96W–69L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
3
Teresa Darling
122W–102L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.