Teams

MEA GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-19vs BCC BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Kristen Royer vs Lauren Christin / Sarah Mills6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs Dana Heather4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJacquie Prescott / Ann Roth vs Anna Mark / Lalenia Quinlan Aweida6-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesDevan Haas / Susan Boennighausen vs Linda Mounce / Helen Spiridellis6-4, 6-3
2022-07-05vs CVTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Susan Boennighausen vs Louise Fowler / Karen Crofton2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCynthia Shick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Morone / Devan Haas vs Nancy Stern / Maggie Brubaker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJacquie Prescott / Miriam McCarty vs Alia Ghandour / Helen Sommer6-2, 6-4
2022-06-28vs BRMST GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMiriam McCarty / Ann Roth vs Micheline Gardner / Valerie Hudson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Lockwood vs Carrie Korth0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Susan Boennighausen vs Wendy Kuhna / Kelly Horace6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Morone / Jennifer Sullivan vs Jody Knaley / Kelly O'Brien6-2, 6-3
2022-06-21vs TTA GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Cynthia Shick vs Michelle Templeton / Joann Butler6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJennifer Sullivan vs Cherie Smith2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Roth / Jacquie Prescott vs Sheila Fossen / Allison Ivy6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDevan Haas / Claire Lochridge vs Alecia Phillips / Vivian Comas7-6, 6-1
2022-06-14vs LTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSamantha MacMillan / Cynthia Shick vs TOMOKO WATANABE / Jan DeBruin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Sullivan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJacquie Prescott / Ann Roth vs Joanne Aschenbrenner / Catherine Sattler6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDevan Haas / Miriam McCarty vs Lorraine Uzzalino-DelGrosso / Mary Ellen O'Rell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-07vs BTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesWendy Morone / Vera Moreno-Hamm vs Christy Valentine / Megan Rudolph6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesClaire Lochridge vs Karen Zacharewicz6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristen Royer / Susan Boennighausen vs Annika Paradise / Monica Mortenson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMiriam McCarty / Ann Roth vs Emily Koechel / Andrea Barsch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Vera Moreno-Hamm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kristen Royer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Susan Boennighausen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Cynthia Shick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.82
Samantha MacMillan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Ann Roth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Jacquie Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Claire Lochridge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Devan Haas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jennifer Sullivan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Julie Lockwood
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Wendy Morone
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Miriam McCarty
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha MacMillan + Ann Roth5360% games+9.2% vs expected
Wendy Morone + Samantha MacMillan5357% games+9.1% vs expected
Jacquie Prescott + Ann Roth11659% games+7.4% vs expected
Miriam McCarty + Ann Roth4362% games+5.6% vs expected
Jacquie Prescott + Susan Boennighausen6554% games+4.4% vs expected
Kristen Royer + Susan Boennighausen3352% games+3.0% vs expected
Samantha MacMillan + Susan Boennighausen6162% games+3.0% vs expected
Kristen Royer + Jacquie Prescott3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vera Moreno-Hamm
45W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Kristen Royer
61W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Susan Boennighausen
58W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Cynthia Shick
54W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Samantha MacMillan
39W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Ann Roth
29W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jacquie Prescott
45W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Claire Lochridge
40W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Devan Haas
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Jennifer Sullivan
19W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Lockwood
20W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Wendy Morone
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Miriam McCarty
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.