Teams

KY/LEX/Wilson

2025 USTA SINGLES LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Men 4.0 (Singles)

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-20vs KY/LEX/Bantz SUPER SMASH SINGLESLost 02
L#1 SinglesGary Spratt vs Shawn Savage1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRicky Coffey vs Chase Wooley3-6, 4-6
2025-08-07vs KY/LEX/Bantz SUPER SMASH SINGLESLost 02
L#1 SinglesRick Prior vs Chase Wooley7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAnthony Pellegrino vs Jason Hawley0-6, 2-6
2025-08-05vs KY/LEX/Bantz SUPER SMASH SINGLESLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnthony Pellegrino vs Will Witherington1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRick Prior vs Adam Bantz6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-23vs KY/LEX/Bantz SUPER SMASH SINGLESLost 02
L#2 SinglesRicky Coffey vs Santiago Bravo4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesMARK MCBRIDE vs Chase Wooley1-6, 3-6
2025-07-20vs KY/LEX/Bantz SUPER SMASH SINGLESLost 02
L#1 SinglesNavin Rajagopalan vs Santiago Bravo3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRick Prior vs Adam Bantz4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 (Singles) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Rick Prior
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Bradley Lewis
published 4
3.43
Lee Robinson
published
3.40
Navin Rajagopalan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Gary Spratt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Ricky Coffey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Anthony Pellegrino
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
MARK MCBRIDE
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Mike Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Robinson + Rick Prior0633% games−5.8% vs expected
Mike Wilson + MARK MCBRIDE1439% gamesnot enough data
Mike Wilson + Ricky Coffey044 matchesnot enough data
Ricky Coffey + Gary Spratt224 matchesnot enough data
Mike Wilson + Lee Robinson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Prior
8W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Bradley Lewis
1W–21L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lee Robinson
3W–30L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Navin Rajagopalan
0W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Gary Spratt
15W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Ricky Coffey
12W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Anthony Pellegrino
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
MARK MCBRIDE
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Mike Wilson
6W–37L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.