Teams

LeDuff, Stacie

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-27vs Stewart, KaitiLost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Tonnar-Seale / Kim Sims vs Sydney Smith / Peyton Puckett1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Brewer / Stacie Leduff vs Olivia Barnard / Brooke Alvis1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCandis Pizzetta / Laura Mccrory vs Mitra Bayati / Alexandria Sylvester3-6, 2-6
2026-08-20vs Taylor, AlyssaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngie Keyes / Kim Sims vs Amy Jones / Dorothy Graham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Mccrory / Jean Tonnar-Seale vs Haiying Anne Chen / Christine Rice2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Mayhue / Kellie Keyes vs Gwynn Cunningham / Megan Lyon3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Amanda Camp
published 3.5
2.90
Connie Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Candis Pizzetta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Angie Keyes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.66
Kellie Keyes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Bett Poole
published 3
2.65
Virginia Pearson
published
2.59
Jean Tonnar-Seale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Laura Mccrory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Stacie Leduff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Judy Gunn
published
2.31
Susan Hale
published
1.94
Amy Mayhue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Leduff + Laura Mccrory1448% games+0.2% vs expected
Angie Keyes + Kellie Keyes1542% gamesnot enough data
Judy Gunn + Candis Pizzetta0525% gamesnot enough data
Judy Gunn + Susan Hale134 matchesnot enough data
Connie Brewer + Stacie Leduff123 matchesnot enough data
Jean Tonnar-Seale + Virginia Pearson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Camp
0W–15L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Connie Brewer
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
3.5
Candis Pizzetta
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
3.5
Angie Keyes
10W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Kellie Keyes
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Bett Poole
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Virginia Pearson
9W–23L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Jean Tonnar-Seale
4W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Laura Mccrory
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Stacie Leduff
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Judy Gunn
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Susan Hale
15W–21L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31
2.5
Amy Mayhue
0W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.