Teams

Heatstrokes

Summer Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY Doubles NA · Ladies 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-13vs The Volley Partons 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Fahrlander / LIZA CAL MAYOR vs Michelle Butterfield / Cassie Ford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSheridan Wilson / Janet Repass vs Melissa Velasquez / Laura Kostelny7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeeAnne Coburn / Madison Brimer vs Lori Burden / Amanda Sevin4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Meredith Kizewski
published
3.99
Lynn Waldman
published
3.87
Janet Repass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Karie Pettinati
published
3.81
Lisa Ruggiero
published
3.79
Amy Fahrlander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Melissa Velasquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Michelle Butterfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cassie Ford
published 4
3.72
NINA MARISCAL
published
3.69
LeeAnne Coburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Ilse Connell
published
3.34
Haylee Darby
published
Susan Harmon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Kizewski + Christina Thompson13265% games+16.8% vs expected
Karie Pettinati + Michelle Butterfield11068% games+12.5% vs expected
Karie Pettinati + Lisa Ruggiero6452% games+2.1% vs expected
Karie Pettinati + Amy Fahrlander3549% games+0.8% vs expected
Karie Pettinati + Janet Repass2352% games+0.8% vs expected
Karie Pettinati + Cassie Ford5258% games+0.6% vs expected
Melissa Velasquez + NINA MARISCAL14951% games−1.2% vs expected
Cassie Ford + Michelle Butterfield4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Kizewski
45W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Lynn Waldman
52W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Janet Repass
95W–62L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
Karie Pettinati
95W–81L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
Lisa Ruggiero
54W–54L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Amy Fahrlander
63W–61L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Melissa Velasquez
73W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Michelle Butterfield
61W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Cassie Ford
40W–33L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
NINA MARISCAL
51W–64L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
LeeAnne Coburn
35W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Ilse Connell
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
4
Christina Thompson
24W–17L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
Haylee Darby
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Harmon
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.