Teams

DiGaetano/JB/3Oaks

2026 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 20 4:00 PM
Allen Park Community Center
Sep 28 6:00 PM
Jonesboro Country Club
Oct 11 6:00 PM
Three Oaks Racquet Club
2026-09-08vs Parker/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Gammill / Jocelyn Johnson vs Lauren Parker / Renee Cobern6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTara Smith / Himaja Balakrishnan vs Tamara Lee / Stefanie Rouse1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShelly Little / Ellen Lawrence vs Alyssa Wenger / Jessica Blackburn6-1, 6-1
2026-08-30vs Cissell/JB/APCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Smith / Tanya Ellington vs Jenny Rogers / Julie Rogers6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelly Little / Niki Carver vs Melanie Burnett / Sarah Milton0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJocelyn Johnson / Theresa Book vs Misty Zaffarano / Jamie Chandler5-5
2026-08-24vs Sandusky/Roberts/JB/3OaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Gammill / Jocelyn Johnson vs Jenny Box / Amy Gibson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelly Little / Ellen Lawrence vs Danial Reed / June Long6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusa Digaetano / Himaja Balakrishnan vs Brandy Johnston / Danae Sandusky6-4, 6-4
2024-11-26Won 20
W#1 SinglesEllen Lawrence vs Stefanie Rouse6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSusa Digaetano vs Lauren Parker6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEllen Lawrence vs Lauren Parker6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-10-28Split 11
W#1 SinglesTanya Ellington vs Stefanie Rouse6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJocelyn Johnson vs Lauren Parker1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-21vs Parker/JB/JCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesTanya Ellington vs Tamara Lee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJocelyn Johnson vs Renee Cobern6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiGaetano/JB/3Oaks000000
2Sandusky/Roberts/JB/3Oaks000000
3Parker/JB/JCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Jacqueline Gammill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ellen Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.69
Tanya Ellington
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Shelly Little
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Tara Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Theresa Book
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Jocelyn Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.42
Himaja Balakrishnan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
Niki Carver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susa Digaetano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Gammill + Tanya Ellington41244% games−0.4% vs expected
Tara Smith + Jocelyn Johnson4455% games−1.9% vs expected
Shelly Little + Ellen Lawrence303 matchesnot enough data
Jocelyn Johnson + Theresa Book123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacqueline Gammill
9W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Ellen Lawrence
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.70
Tanya Ellington
8W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Shelly Little
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Tara Smith
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%35%65%
2.55
Theresa Book
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
Jocelyn Johnson
23W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
3
Himaja Balakrishnan
2W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
Niki Carver
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Susa Digaetano
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.