Teams

Sweetman/40s/6.5/PAC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Danielle Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.00
Cinamon Higbee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Amy St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Jana Phillippi
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Jeanne Woodrick
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Jessica Haley
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Mica Rolling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sonia Maltais
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Stacey Monaghan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Sweetman + Kathie Daigle4351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Roussel
16W–11L career · 11 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Cinamon Higbee
1W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Amy St. Romain
15W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Ellen Sweetman
20W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–21L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jana Phillippi
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Woodrick
10W–21L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Haley
21W–3L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–16L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Toce
30W–23L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mica Rolling
15W–5L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sonia Maltais
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Monaghan
10W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.