Teams

Yonkers Tennis Center: Doubles the Fun

2024 18&Over Women Day Fall · 2.5 Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-04vs NRRC: Nice Racqu(ettes)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Janet Lau vs Mili Brown / Amanda Heller2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlice Kung / Ami Song vs Linda Fang / Kristina Vasandani6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNoelle DelGiudice / Meghan Donohue vs Purvi Shah / Katie Ciravolo6-7, 3-6
2023-11-30vs Sportime HI ArmadaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Pucci / Meghan Donohue vs LINDSAY NAZE / Sarah Dunn0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarsha Hager / Joan Indig vs Maureen Winner / Sarah Ryan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Ami Song vs Kally Atkins / Andrea Johnson6-2, 6-3
2023-11-28vs Westchester Country ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Hager / Caitlin Chang vs Katie Bellmare / Kerry Soliman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Kung / Meghan Donohue vs Kim Brennan / Erin Ahrens5-7, 2-6
2023-11-13vs Westchester Tennis CenterWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarsha Hager / Pamela Opdyke vs Jessica Jorna / Anke Sulimma6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMeghan Donohue / Alice Kung vs Shelly Colley / Sarah Falcone2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Ami Song vs Robyn Condie / Karen Wagner6-2, 6-3
2023-11-09vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarsha Hager / Joan Indig vs Angela Eaves / Nataliya Gambino1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Opdyke / Andrea Pucci vs Frances Magrino / Barbara Corini4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJanet Lau / Joan Indig vs Karryn Angoff / Marci Ponagai1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Ami Song vs Karen Burrowes / Joan Marrinan5-7, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNoelle DelGiudice / Meghan Donohue vs Randi Finkelstein / Kimberley Hortopan2-6, 1-6
2023-10-23vs Sportime Lake Isle: Rye RalliesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Alice Kung vs Sasha North-Clauss / Claire Weschler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle DelGiudice / Meghan Donohue vs Katie Stewart / Jennifer Eylward6-0, 6-3
2023-10-16vs TIA: SlammertimeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Lopes / Meghan Donohue vs Claudia Zumbro / Hillary Krane0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Chang / Alice Kung vs Sukaina Klein / Barbara Trencher6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNoelle DelGiudice / Pamela Opdyke vs Cristy Eguiluz / Yuliya Charamnykh2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMarsha Hager / Ana Lopes vs Naomi Kono / Chrissy Jee1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Indig / Alice Kung vs AYUKO KOBAYASHI / Naoko Uchida7-6, 2-3
L#3 DoublesMeghan Donohue / Pamela Opdyke vs Nicole Porell / Adrienne Harper4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Deanna Santoro
published 3.5
Caitlin Chang
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Ami Song
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Marsha Hager
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
2.33
Noelle DelGiudice
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ana Lopes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Alice Kung
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.01
Andrea Pucci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.88
Joan Indig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Janet Lau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meghan Donohue
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Pamela Opdyke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlin Chang + Ami Song3255% games+10.1% vs expected
Alice Kung + Caitlin Chang314 matchesnot enough data
Alice Kung + Meghan Donohue134 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Pucci + Caitlin Chang123 matchesnot enough data
Alice Kung + Joan Indig123 matchesnot enough data
Noelle DelGiudice + Meghan Donohue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Santoro
93W–92L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Caitlin Chang
17W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ami Song
27W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Marsha Hager
11W–27L career · 13 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
Noelle DelGiudice
14W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Ana Lopes
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Alice Kung
15W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Andrea Pucci
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Joan Indig
5W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Janet Lau
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Donohue
10W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Opdyke
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.