Teams

NJ YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs RHCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesMeghan Disch / Lesley Kuhl vs Kolleen Konecny / Kimberly Salazar Suman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Stanley vs Kristin Magner3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHaley Pouchot / Dawn Cartier vs Heather Frick / Tessa Vickers6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Laura Yonamine vs Rebecca Jones / Emily Weiland5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-06vs MC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesCourtney Eccles / Laura Yonamine vs Crystal Bailey / Chris Romer6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Stanley vs Katie Policaro7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelanie Abel / Barb Redford vs Deborah Clark / Jody Barbour6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLesley Kuhl / Norma Crockett vs Robin Vint / Anya Civitella6-1, 6-3
2026-06-29vs NJ PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlison Castel / Lesley Kuhl vs Hope Yasbin Engel / Jennifer Gardner6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCourtney Eccles vs Barb McEahern3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNorma Crockett / Haley Pouchot vs Ingrid Palmer / Joni Roberts6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelanie Abel / Karen Stanley vs Karen Kirby / Jessica Blazejewski6-0, 6-2
2026-06-22vs RHCC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesNorma Crockett / Lesley Kuhl vs Kelly Brewster / Melissa Argenti3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlison Castel vs Danielle Linse6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Yonamine / Courtney Eccles vs Terri Whitehair / Carla Grumann6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHaley Pouchot / Melanie Abel vs Jody Alderman / Alecia Drake7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-15vs BP GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaura Yonamine / Lesley Kuhl vs Amy Daly / Erica Younkin6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Stanley vs Lexi Owens6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNorma Crockett / Dawn Cartier vs Audrey Pezzotti / Hillary Hoffman6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Abel / Meghan Disch vs Sharlene Funk / Kelly Zander6-4, 6-3
2026-06-08vs RHCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesDawn Cartier / Laura Yonamine vs Tessa Vickers / Emily Weiland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCourtney Eccles vs Heather Frick7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarb Redford / Alison Castel vs Morgan Swank / Kristin Magner2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Stanley / Haley Pouchot vs Lauren Carpenter / Kimberly Salazar Suman6-7, 3-6
2026-06-01vs MC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesNorma Crockett / Courtney Eccles vs Katie Policaro / Crystal Bailey7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAlison Castel vs Jody Barbour6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLesley Kuhl / Meghan Disch vs Robin Vint / Deborah Clark6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHaley Pouchot / Barb Redford vs Kay Newman / Monica Heydari6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Courtney Eccles
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.99
Dawn Cartier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Laura Yonamine
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Barb Redford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Karen Stanley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Norma Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Alison Castel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Melanie Abel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Lesley Kuhl
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.64
Haley Pouchot
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.57
Meghan Disch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Abel + Barb Redford4358% games+15.1% vs expected
Norma Crockett + Laura Yonamine7655% games+6.0% vs expected
Norma Crockett + Dawn Cartier4354% games−2.9% vs expected
Dawn Cartier + Barb Redford4351% games−7.8% vs expected
Dawn Cartier + Laura Yonamine3357% gamesnot enough data
Laura Yonamine + Barb Redford4163% gamesnot enough data
Norma Crockett + Courtney Eccles404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Stanley + Laura Yonamine224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Eccles
39W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Dawn Cartier
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Laura Yonamine
50W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Barb Redford
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Karen Stanley
24W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Norma Crockett
56W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Alison Castel
19W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Melanie Abel
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Lesley Kuhl
27W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Haley Pouchot
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Meghan Disch
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.