Teams

TOC.Condon

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 40 & Over · Tri-Level 40 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-26vs TOC.HutchensLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Swank / Megan Kimsey vs Shelly Jude / Ngoc Tran3-6, 1-6
2025-07-13vs TOC.HutchensLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Carroll / Megan Kimsey vs Amber Bruner / Alison Ferreira2-6, 2-6
2025-07-12vs TOC.SwainWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Kimsey / Chrissy Morgan vs Lisa Mason / Shylaja Karimanye6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBracha Blanc / Stephanie Jabusch vs LuAnn Eyerman / Sarah Rodriguez6-3, 6-4
2025-06-14vs TING.LowranceLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jabusch / Bracha Blanc vs Kimberly Latzy / Lauren Fye1-6, 3-6
2025-06-07vs TOC.SwainLost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Lilly / Michele Chambers vs Cara Casuccio / Kristina Narula2-6, 1-6
2025-05-24vs MD.HelmsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBracha Blanc / Maureen Green vs Beth Blake / Kelly Shields6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 40 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Emily Yang
published
2.94
Megan Kimsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
published
2.92
Lisa Swank
published
2.75
Maureen Green
published
2.68
Bracha Blanc
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.55
Kelli Moore
published
2.29
Katherine Clarida
published
2.27
Katie Lilly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
JACKELYN MUNOZ
published
1.90
Michele Chambers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Yang
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Megan Kimsey
100W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Lisa Swank
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Maureen Green
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Bracha Blanc
291W–288L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kelli Moore
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Katherine Clarida
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Katie Lilly
40W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
JACKELYN MUNOZ
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Michele Chambers
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.