Teams

5 Avalon Luchsinger

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.28 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-18vs 9 ACAC WilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Jason Hetherington vs Thomas Wilson / Randolph Moore6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-10vs 7 Burkwood ClarkLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicholas Grainger / Frank Mason vs Mike Davis / Zach Parr2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Jonathan Kovarcik3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs James Mullahy6-2, 6-3
2022-06-23vs 10 James River SurgeWon 10
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grainger vs Waiman Law6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Nicholas Grainger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Matthew Luchsinger
published
3.19
Tim Dolan
published
3.16
Gregory Blouch
published 3.5
3.15
Frank Mason
published 3.5
3.15
Jason Hetherington
published
3.09
John French
published
3.03
Mark Schultz
published
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.91
Darrell Jervey
published 3
2.88
Rob Henley
published
2.83
Gary Woods
published 3
David Harbach
published 3
2.72
Frank Trani
published 3
2.60
Scott Schoenborn
published
Mahood Fonville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Edlavitch + Nicholas Grainger10165% games+9.6% vs expected
Gary Woods + Gregory Blouch2443% gamesnot enough data
John French + Mark Schultz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicholas Grainger
109W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Matthew Luchsinger
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Tim Dolan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gregory Blouch
8W–32L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Frank Mason
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jason Hetherington
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
John French
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mark Schultz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Darrell Jervey
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Gary Woods
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
David Harbach
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Frank Trani
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
Scott Schoenborn
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mahood Fonville
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.