Teams

GSTL18/Hickman/RLTC

2026 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Men 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-20vs GSTL 3.0M 18 & Over (Lazar)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesChad Tingen / Scott Leroux vs Ryan Massey / David Lazar4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKamil Kaminski vs Cameron Edge4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesScott DeVaux / Christopher Hickman vs Gabriel Phillips / Vasilios Pournaras0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Shank / Jeff Fribance vs Josh Gaddy / Jay Bonnoitt6-1, 7-6
2026-04-13vs GSTL18/McKeever/GrandeDunesWon 32
W#1 DoublesChad Tingen / Tudor Chirau vs Carlos Ramirez / Axel Salinas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDean Kolenbrener vs Geoff Astle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesScott DeVaux / Michael Shank vs Carl King / Ryan Smith6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKamil Kaminski vs Peter Laptewicz6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristopher Hickman / Rodney Matthews vs Tom McKeever / Paul MacGregor1-6, 2-6
2026-03-23vs GSTL 3.0M 18 & Over (Lazar)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesChristopher Hickman / Scott DeVaux vs David Lazar / Ryan Massey2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDean Kolenbrener vs Cameron Edge1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeff Fribance / Chad Tingen vs Robert Prinzi / Gabriel Phillips0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKamil Kaminski vs Dylan Arnold7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Leroux / Michael Shank vs Vasilios Pournaras / Jonathan Mishoe0-6, 1-6
2026-03-16vs GSTL18/McKeever/GrandeDunesLost 23
L#1 DoublesKamil Kaminski / Rodney Matthews vs Carlos Ramirez / Axel Salinas1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTudor Chirau vs Peter Laptewicz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Shank / Dean Kolenbrener vs Ryan Smith / Paul MacGregor6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRami Zaki vs Tom McKeever1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesScott DeVaux / Christopher Hickman vs Carl King / Rich Ober4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-02vs GSTL 3.0M 18 & Over (Lazar)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesChad Tingen / Jeff Fribance vs Vasilios Pournaras / Jonathan Mishoe2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKamil Kaminski vs David Lazar1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRami Zaki / Michael Shank vs Robert Prinzi / Gabriel Phillips2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTudor Chirau vs Radley Short4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott DeVaux / Lucas Unger vs Jay Bonnoitt / Ryan Massey2-6, 2-6
2026-02-23vs GSTL18/McKeever/GrandeDunesWon 32
W#1 DoublesChad Tingen / Scott Leroux vs Warren de Villiers / Axel Salinas6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKamil Kaminski vs Peter Laptewicz6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Hickman / Scott DeVaux vs Jak Lerdgidkjon / Tom McKeever2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDean Kolenbrener vs Carlos Ramirez6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff Fribance / Michael Shank vs Ryan Smith / Geoff Astle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Dean Kolenbrener
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Tudor Chirau
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Scott Leroux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Chad Tingen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Kamil Kaminski
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.79
Scott DeVaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Jeff Fribance
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Michael Shank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Christopher Hickman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Rami Zaki
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lucas Unger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rodney Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott DeVaux + Christopher Hickman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean Kolenbrener
7W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tudor Chirau
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Scott Leroux
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Chad Tingen
2W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Kamil Kaminski
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Scott DeVaux
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Jeff Fribance
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Michael Shank
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christopher Hickman
1W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Rami Zaki
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Lucas Unger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rodney Matthews
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.