Teams

Roberts, Colleen

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 9.5

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Women 9.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roberts, Colleen000000
2Nunnally, Emily000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Fernanda Cota
published 4.5
Hannah Hopson
published 4.5
3.95
Kellan Clower
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Anna Fiser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.76
Miles Munn
published
Madison Williams
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Fernanda Cota
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Hannah Hopson
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kellan Clower
24W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4.5
Anna Fiser
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
Miles Munn
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.76
Madison Williams
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.