Teams

SKY RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs EM BLACKWon 10
W#1 SinglesMychael Jones vs Amy Pell6-2, 6-4
2023-08-31vs WP ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMychael Jones / Lauryn Meyer vs Sara Singh / Natalie Jacobsen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-24vs CM GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesMychael Jones / Jessie Johnson vs Julie McLaughlin / Ashley Andrews6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLauryn Meyer vs FIONA PENNEY6-1, 6-3
2023-08-17vs SKY BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauryn Meyer / Jessie Johnson vs Becky McBride / Sharlene Keithley7-6, 7-5
2023-08-10vs DTP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMychael Jones / Lauryn Meyer vs Kelly Dobson / Nora Tucker3-6, 5-7
2023-08-03vs DTC REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesMychael Jones vs Harley Opsahl6-1, 6-1
2023-07-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauryn Meyer vs Susan Tavel6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Sharon Alton
published 3
2.68
Jessie Johnson
published
2.67
Lauryn Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.67
Mychael Jones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.27
Michelle Hoskins
published
2.12
MaryKay Casey
published
1.82
Kate Kalstein
published
1.78
Kathleen Newman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Hoskins + MaryKay Casey2441% games+1.0% vs expected
Lauryn Meyer + Mychael Jones4350% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Newman + MaryKay Casey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sharon Alton
54W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
Jessie Johnson
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Lauryn Meyer
45W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Mychael Jones
49W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Michelle Hoskins
12W–39L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
MaryKay Casey
8W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kate Kalstein
0W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Kathleen Newman
2W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.